Hi,
We are planning to build NAS solution which will be primarily used via NFS
and CIFS and workloads ranging from various archival application to more
“real-time processing”. The NAS will not be used as a block storage for
virtual machines, so the access really will always be file oriented.
We a
;proxy") mount.
>> >
>> > I had such a setup with nfs and switched to mount CephFS directly. If
>> using NFS with the same data, you must make sure your HA works well to
>> avoid data corruption.
>> > With ceph-fuse you directly connect to the cluster, on
> mount to clients directly. And also can remove that single point of network
> congestion.
>
> Guess depends on the performance and uptime required , as I’d say that
> could factory into your decisions.
>
> On Mon, 12 Nov 2018 at 10:36 PM, Premysl Kouril
> wrote:
>
use case mean you need something like nfs/cifs and can’t use
> CephFS mount directly?
>
> Has been quite a few advances in that area with quotas and user management
> in recent versions.
>
> But obviously all depends on your use case at client end.
>
> On Mon, 12 Nov 2018
