Hi all,
I'm in the process of building a ceph cluster, primarily to use cephFS. At
this stage I'm in the planning phase and doing a lot of reading on best
practices for building the cluster, however there's one question that I
haven't been able to find an answer to.
Is it better to use many host
On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 1:58 PM, Christian Balzer wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Aug 2017 13:40:29 +0800 Nick Tan wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'm in the process of building a ceph cluster, primarily to use cephFS.
> At
> > this stage I'm in the planni
On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 3:58 PM, Ronny Aasen
wrote:
> On 21. aug. 2017 07:40, Nick Tan wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm in the process of building a ceph cluster, primarily to use cephFS.
>> At this stage I'm in the planning phase and doing a lot of readi
On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 8:57 PM, David Turner wrote:
> It is not recommended to get your cluster more than 70% full due to
> rebalancing and various other reasons. That would change your 12x 10TB
> disks in a host to only be 84TB if you filled your cluster to 70% full. I
> still think that the mo
Hi Christian,
> > Hi David,
> >
> > The planned usage for this CephFS cluster is scratch space for an image
> > processing cluster with 100+ processing nodes.
>
> Lots of clients, how much data movement would you expect, how many images
> come in per timeframe, lets say an hour?
> Typical size o
ter if
required.
Thanks,
Nick
On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 6:56 PM, Christian Balzer wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, 22 Aug 2017 16:51:47 +0800 Nick Tan wrote:
>
> > Hi Christian,
> >
> >
> >
> > > > Hi David,
> > > >
> > > > The
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 2:28 PM, Christian Balzer wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Aug 2017 13:38:25 +0800 Nick Tan wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the advice Christian. I think I'm leaning more towards the
> > 'traditional' storage server with 12 disks - as you say they give a
