[ceph-users] Stripping rados-classes libraries

2013-09-16 Thread Nick Bartos
Which symbols need to be kept when stripping the libraries in rados-classes? I found this e-mail from 2010: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.ceph.devel/1543 Is it still just symbols that start with __cls_ that need to be kept? We compile ceph with debug symbols and strip them o

[ceph-users] 0.56.3 OSDs wrongly marked down and cluster unresponsiveness

2013-02-28 Thread Nick Bartos
When a single high I/O event (in this case a cp of a 10G file on a filesystem mounted on an rbd) occurs, I'm having the 2 OSDs that reside on the same system where the rbd is mounted being marked down when it appears that they shouldn't be. Additionally, other cluster services start timing out jus

Re: [ceph-users] 0.56.3 OSDs wrongly marked down and cluster unresponsiveness

2013-02-28 Thread Nick Bartos
ould leave this to probably Alex and Sam.) > -Greg > > On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 1:44 PM, Nick Bartos wrote: >> When a single high I/O event (in this case a cp of a 10G file on a >> filesystem mounted on an rbd) occurs, I'm having the 2 OSDs that >> reside on the same s

[ceph-users] Which web server for radosgw?

2013-02-28 Thread Nick Bartos
What web server is recommended for the radosgw front-end? From what I understand nginx buffers content before sending it to fastcgi, so that may have issues on larger files or streams. It seems like apache and lighttpd are reasonable alternatives. What are you running and how well does it work?

Re: [ceph-users] Which web server for radosgw?

2013-03-01 Thread Nick Bartos
Great, thanks. Where can I download the modified mod_fastcgi module? On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 11:24 PM, Yehuda Sadeh wrote: > On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 4:46 PM, Nick Bartos wrote: >> What web server is recommended for the radosgw front-end? From what I >> understand nginx buffers

Re: [ceph-users] Which web server for radosgw?

2013-03-01 Thread Nick Bartos
Thanks! On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Tyler Brekke wrote: > There are packages available here. > > http://gitbuilder.ceph.com/libapache-mod-fastcgi-deb-precise-x86_64-basic/ > > Source can be found here > > https://github.com/ceph/mod_fastcgi > > > On Fri, Mar 1

Re: [ceph-users] Which web server for radosgw?

2013-03-01 Thread Nick Bartos
Are you guys using apache 2.2.x or 2.4.x, and with which mpm? On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Nick Bartos wrote: > Thanks! > > On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Tyler Brekke > wrote: >> There are packages available here. >> >> http://gitbuilder.ceph.com/libapache-

[ceph-users] Radosgw only gives 400s

2013-03-04 Thread Nick Bartos
I'm trying to figure out what's wrong with my radosgw setup. I am getting HTTP 400 responses when running some basic stat/upload tests, which work fine when using openstack (folsom) swift. Additionally, I get HTTP 400 responses when trying to use the openstack (folsom) dashboard to list or create

Re: [ceph-users] Radosgw only gives 400s

2013-03-04 Thread Nick Bartos
10 http_status=400 == On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 9:11 AM, Yehuda Sadeh wrote: > On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Nick Bartos wrote: >> I'm trying to figure out what's wrong with my radosgw setup. I am >> getting HTTP 400 responses when running some basic stat/upload tes

Re: [ceph-users] Radosgw only gives 400s

2013-03-04 Thread Nick Bartos
le: Mar 4 17:38:16 node-172-17-0-13 apache2[31127]: [error] [client 172.17.0.15] chunked Transfer-Encoding forbidden: /swift/v1/test/test Looks like this may be an apache issue. Any ideas? On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 9:31 AM, Yehuda Sadeh wrote: > On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 9:18 AM, Nick Bartos

Re: [ceph-users] Radosgw only gives 400s

2013-03-04 Thread Nick Bartos
ceph.com/libapache-mod-fastcgi-deb-precise-x86_64-basic/ > > Sources for it here: > > https://github.com/ceph/mod_fastcgi > > On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 9:43 AM, Nick Bartos wrote: >> Yup, that was it. My endpoints were wrong (still using the endpoints >> from openstack swift).

Re: [ceph-users] Radosgw only gives 400s

2013-03-04 Thread Nick Bartos
Yup, that was it. There was an install problem on my testing machine. Thanks so much for your help! On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 9:59 AM, Yehuda Sadeh wrote: > Not that I'm aware of. Make sure you're really using the module you > think you're using. > > On Mon, Mar 4, 2

[ceph-users] ceph.conf "include another file" option?

2013-03-04 Thread Nick Bartos
Since radosgw requires the keystone admin token stored in ceph.conf, and certain unprivileged services we run need access to ceph.conf, I'm going to have to make a separate ceph.conf just for radosgw. However, it would be nice if I didn't have to duplicate things in the main ceph.conf. Is there a

[ceph-users] radosgw log insanely verbose

2013-03-04 Thread Nick Bartos
I'm trying to figure out how to tone down the radosgw log messages, preferably just to warnings and errors. Here's an excerpt from a simple bucket list from the openstack dashboard: https://gist.github.com/anonymous/aabe9886a7c236cc2321 Note that the "radosgw.log" entries are generated from outp

Re: [ceph-users] radosgw log insanely verbose

2013-03-04 Thread Nick Bartos
d not things that are expected under normal operation (especially things that generate log entries on each successful request). On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 8:43 PM, Yehuda Sadeh wrote: > On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 8:16 PM, Nick Bartos wrote: >> I'm trying to figure out how to tone down the r

[ceph-users] radosgw bucket/containers must be >= 3 chars long?

2013-03-04 Thread Nick Bartos
When trying to create a swift container with a length of 1 or 2 characters, I get a 400 error. When choosing a container name with at least 3 characters, this does not happen. Is this an arbitrary limit that can be easily changed? Mar 5 05:57:19 172.18.0.13 radosgw: 2013-03-05 05:57:19.798928 7

Re: [ceph-users] radosgw log insanely verbose

2013-03-05 Thread Nick Bartos
; << t.expiration << dendl; + ldout(cct, 1) << "validated token: " << t.tenant_name << ":" << t.user_name << " expires: " << t.expiration << dendl; rgw_set_keystone_token_auth_info(t, info); On Mon, Mar 4, 201

[ceph-users] Wildcard for "rgw keystone accepted roles"

2013-03-06 Thread Nick Bartos
Is there a way to allow all roles (aside from listing them all) access to radosgw when using keystone? If new roles get added, I want them to automatically have access. ___ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.

Re: [ceph-users] Wildcard for "rgw keystone accepted roles"

2013-03-07 Thread Nick Bartos
Thanks! On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 7:35 PM, Yehuda Sadeh wrote: > On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Nick Bartos wrote: >> Is there a way to allow all roles (aside from listing them all) access >> to radosgw when using keystone? If new roles get added, I want them >> to auto