You may config your kernel routing map so that the default outward
socket would be the one you wonder
___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
2015-02-03 0:48 GMT+08:00 Gregory Farnum :
> On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 5:27 AM, Andrei Mikhailovsky wrote:
>> Hi cephers,
>>
>> I've got three questions:
>>
>> 1. Does anyone have an estimation on the release dates of the next stable
>> ceph branch?
>
> We should be branching Hammer from master today
client system
> and physically disabling kernel caching.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Nicheal [mailto:zay11...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, February 02, 2015 7:35 PM
> To: Bruce McFarland
> Cc: ceph-us...@ceph.com; Prashanth Nednoor
> Subject: Re: [ceph-users] RBD cachi
It seems you use the kernel rbd. So rbd_cache does not work, which is
just designed for librbd. Kernel rbd is directly using the system page
cache. You said that you have already run like echo 3 >
/proc/sys/vm/drop_cache to invalidate all pages cached in kernel. So
do you test the /dev/rbd1 based o
Umm.. Too many Threads are created in SimpleMessenger, every pipe
should create two working threads for sending and receiving messages.
Thus, AsyncMessenger would be promissing but still in development.
Regards
Ning Yao
2015-03-09 20:48 GMT+08:00 Christian Eichelmann :
> Hi Karan,
>
> as you are
2015-03-10 3:01 GMT+08:00 Sage Weil :
> On Mon, 9 Mar 2015, Karan Singh wrote:
>> Thanks Guys kernel.pid_max=4194303 did the trick.
>
> Great to hear! Sorry we missed that you only had it at 65536.
>
> This is a really common problem that people hit when their clusters start
> to grow. Is there s
st = ceph0
mon addr = 192.168.1.70:6789
So I was puzzled here that what is the purpose of the parameter
mon_initial_members. And When we should use it? Can any one show an
example?
Nicheal
Regards
2014-10-21 14:51 GMT+08:00 Nicheal :
> Hi guys,
_
Hi guys,
___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
2014-10-21 7:40 GMT+08:00 Lionel Bouton :
> Hi,
>
> Le 21/10/2014 01:10, 池信泽 a écrit :
>
> Thanks.
>
>Another reason is the checksum in the attr of object used for deep scrub
> in EC pools should be computed when modify the object. When supporting the
> random write, We should caculate the whol
ossible to make use of this feature to realize
the model, if miss 4k, we just promote 4k data to the hot pool and
saving it into kv-store? Expecting haomai Wang's input
Nicheal,
Regards
>> Thanks.
>>
>>
>>
>> __
10 matches
Mail list logo
