Hi all,
I'm testing backup product which supports Amazon S3 as target for Archive
storage and I'm trying to setup a Ceph cluster configured with the S3 API to
use as an internal target for backup archives instead of AWS.
I've followed the online guide for setting up Radosgw and created a defa
> Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 11:43:44 -0400
> From: yeh...@redhat.com
> To: neville.tay...@hotmail.co.uk
> CC: ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Radosgw authorization failed
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Neville"
> Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 12:17:48 -0400
> From: yeh...@redhat.com
> To: neville.tay...@hotmail.co.uk
> CC: ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Radosgw authorization failed
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Neville&quo
> On 31 Mar 2015, at 11:38, Neville wrote:
>
>
>
> > Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 12:17:48 -0400
> > From: yeh...@redhat.com
> > To: neville.tay...@hotmail.co.uk
> > CC: ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> > Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Radosgw authorization failed
vops-kvm02:/var/lib/nova/instances# cat test
cat: test: Operation not permitted
root@devops-kvm02:/var/lib/nova/instances#
Should this even work? My understanding is CephFS allows concurrent access but
I'm not sure if there is some file locking go
--r-- 1 root root 0 Apr 21 13:38 test
root@devops-kvm01:/var/lib/nova/instances# id nova
uid=120(nova) gid=120(nova) groups=120(nova),114(libvirtd)
thanks,
Neville
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 15:49:43 +0300
From: hco...@gmail.com
To: ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] CephFS
orage to get it working as I was keen to try out
CephFS anyway, it's more a question of whether what I've done should work in
theory and trying to find out why it doesn't.
Thanks,
Neville
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 08:26:15 -0600
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] CephFS concurrency question
ccessed on the other.
Thanks,
Neville
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 15:31:40 +0100
From: john.sp...@redhat.com
To: neville.tay...@hotmail.co.uk; ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] CephFS concurrency question
On 21/04/15 13:43, Neville wrote:
To
