Re: [ceph-users] mounting RBD in linux containers

2014-08-10 Thread Lorieri
same here, did you manage to fix it ? On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Kevin Weiler wrote: > Hi Josh, > > We did map it directly to the host, and it seems to work just fine. I > think this is a problem with how the container is accessing the rbd module. > > -- > > Kevin Weiler > > IT > > > IMC Fi

[ceph-users] docker + coreos + ceph

2014-08-10 Thread Lorieri
Hi, I've playing with CoreOS and got it (dirty) running with Ceph. No big deal, but it can save some time. 1 - An image of docker-registry that stores on radosgw: https://registry.hub.docker.com/u/lorieri/registry-ceph/ 2 - Steps to get the rbd running in the host machine: - find o

Re: [ceph-users] Fw: single node installation

2014-08-10 Thread Lorieri
http://ceph.com/docs/dumpling/start/quick-ceph-deploy/ ___ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

Re: [ceph-users] docker + coreos + ceph

2014-09-02 Thread Lorieri
it is added officially now https://coreos.com/releases/#423.0.0 cheers, -lorieri On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 12:28 AM, Lorieri wrote: > Hi, > > I've playing with CoreOS and got it (dirty) running with Ceph. > No big deal, but it can save some time. > > 1 - An image of dock

Re: [ceph-users] docker + coreos + ceph

2014-09-03 Thread Lorieri
ule :) > > > > Good thing nonetheless ! > > -- > > David Moreau Simard > > > > > > > > Le 2014-09-02, 8:57 PM, « Lorieri » a écrit : > > > > >it is added officially now > > > > > >https://coreos.com/releases/#423.

[ceph-users] docker distribution

2015-08-17 Thread Lorieri
ld be great if you test it. https://hub.docker.com/r/lorieri/docker-distribution-generic-s3/ Note: if you already use the old docker-registry you must create another bucket and push the images again, the API changed to v2. There is a shellscript to help https://github.com/docker/migrator How I t

Re: [ceph-users] docker distribution

2015-08-26 Thread Lorieri
looks like it only works if an nginx is in front of radosgw, it translates absolute URIs and maybe fix other issues: https://github.com/docker/distribution/pull/808#issuecomment-135286314 https://github.com/docker/distribution/pull/902 On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 1:37 PM, Lorieri wrote: >

Re: [ceph-users] cephfs survey results

2014-12-05 Thread Lorieri
Hi, if I have a situation when each node in a cluster writes their own files in cephfs, is it safe to use multiple MDS ? I mean, is the problem using multiple MDS related to nodes writing same files ? thanks, -lorieri On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 9:47 PM, Shain Miley wrote: > +1 for fsck

[ceph-users] cephfs modification time

2015-01-09 Thread Lorieri
s the problem and suggest ntp sync I tried to re-sync ntp and restart the ceph cluster, but the issue persists do you know if it is possible to avoid this behavior ? thanks -lorieri ___ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.cep

Re: [ceph-users] cephfs modification time

2015-01-09 Thread Lorieri
15-01-10 01:13:46.0 + Birth: - On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 11:11 PM, Lorieri wrote: > Hi, > > I have a program that tails a file and this file is create on another machine > > some tail programs does not work because the modification time is not > updated i

Re: [ceph-users] cephfs modification time

2015-01-12 Thread Lorieri
m is doing on > which nodes? > -Greg > > On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 5:15 PM, Lorieri wrote: >> first 3 stat commands shows blocks and size changing, but not the times >> after a touch it changes and tail works >> >> I saw some cephfs freezes related to it, it c

[ceph-users] neither posix nor rest

2014-03-11 Thread Lorieri
. Of course those features, and object listing by prefix are not there for good reason that I don't know, but maybe it worths to be implemented and could make it easier for us (users) to innovate using ceph. -lorieri ___ ceph-users mailing list

[ceph-users] neither POSIX nor REST

2014-03-12 Thread Lorieri
Hi, I saw radosgw-admin doesn't require radosgw daemon. I was wondering if by adding creation of buckets and manipulation of objects to radosgw-admin (or a library similar to it) ceph would have a great tool between the low and high levels of rados and radosgw, and simpler than cephfs. Of course

Re: [ceph-users] RadosGW and S3-compatible clients for PC and OSX

2013-04-21 Thread Lorieri
I like s3cmd, but it allows you only manipulate buckets with at least one capital letter On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Igor Laskovy wrote: > Just initial connect to rgw server, nothing further. > Please see below behavior for CrossFTP and S3Browser cases. > > On CrossFTP side: > [R1] Connec

Re: [ceph-users] RadosGW and S3-compatible clients for PC and OSX

2013-04-23 Thread Lorieri
, etc for osx: brew install s3cmd []s -lorieri On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 4:00 PM, Igor Laskovy wrote: > So, I totally lost in this, but I did it, and now CrossFTP report: > [R1] Connect to osd01.ceph.labspace.studiogrizzly.com > [R1] Current path: / > [R1] Current path: / > [R1] L