On Tue, 2014-09-30 at 00:30 +0900, Christian Balzer wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Sep 2014 11:15:21 +0200 Emmanuel Lacour wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 05:57:12PM +0900, Christian Balzer wrote:
> > >
> > > Given your SSDs, are they failing after more than 150TB have been
> > > written?
> >
> > betw
On Wed, 2017-09-06 at 15:23 +, Sage Weil wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Traditionally, we have done a major named "stable" release twice a year,
> and every other such release has been an "LTS" release, with fixes
> backported for 1-2 years.
>
> With kraken and luminous we missed our schedule by
How did you find the fuse client performed?
I'm more interested in the fuse client because I'd like to use CephFS
for shared volumes, and my understanding of the kernel client is that it
uses the volume as a block device.
Cheers,
Kingsley.
On Tue, 2017-01-17 at 11:46 +, Sean Redmond wrote:
>
On Tue, 2017-01-17 at 13:49 +0100, Loris Cuoghi wrote:
> I think you're confusing CephFS kernel client and RBD kernel client.
>
> The Linux kernel contains both:
>
> * a module ceph.ko for accessing a CephFS
> * a module rbd.ko for accessing an RBD (Rados Block Device)
>
> You can mount a CephFS
as backup). This has been running great.
>
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 12:14 PM, Kingsley Tart
> wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-01-17 at 13:49 +0100, Loris Cuoghi wrote:
> > I think you're confusing CephFS kernel client and RBD kernel
> client.
> >
&
webservers. So essentially is acting like a NAS using NFS.
> All servers see the same data.
>
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 12:26 PM, Kingsley Tart
> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Are these all
On Tue, 2017-01-17 at 19:04 +0100, Ilya Dryomov wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 6:49 PM, Kingsley Tart wrote:
> > Oh that's good. I thought the kernel clients only supported block
> > devices. I guess that has changed since I last looked.
>
> That has always bee
