onmap /tmp/monmap --keyring
/tmp/ceph.mon.keyring
That simply makes things crazy in 0.94.1.
Once I substituted the fqdn by simply the hostname (without the domain)
it worked.
Cheers
Goncalo
--
Goncalo Borges
Research Computing
ARC Centre of Excellence for Particle Physics at the Terascale
dir.entries="67"
ceph.dir.files="67"
ceph.dir.layout="stripe_unit=524288 stripe_count=8
object_size=4194304 pool=cephfs_dt"
ceph.dir.rbytes="549755863046"
ceph.dir.rctime="1438569478.09995047310"
ceph.dir.rentries="68"
ceph.dir.rfile
afaiu, should have an
immediate effect (let us say a couple of seconds) in the system. This is
not what I am experiencing where sometimes, my perception is that sizes
are never updated until a new operation is triggered
Cheers
Goncalo
On 08/03/2015 01:20 PM, Goncalo Borges wrote:
Dear CephFS
today at 13:00 EDT (17:00 UTC). Please stop by and hear a
technical deep dive on CephFS and ask any questions you might have.
Thanks!
http://ceph.com/ceph-tech-talks/
direct link to the video conference: https://bluejeans.com/172084437/browser
--
Goncalo Borges
Research Computing
ARC Centre
Hey John...
First of all. thank you for the nice talks you have been giving around.
See the feedback on your suggestions bellow, plus some additional questions.
However, please note that in my example I am not doing only
deletions but also creating and updating files, which afaiu,
space reported by a df command in
this case?
My naive assumption would be that a df should show as used space 512KB x
3. Is this correct?
Cheers
Goncalo
--
Goncalo Borges
Research Computing
ARC Centre of Excellence for Particle Physics at the Terascale
School of Physics A28 | University of
Hi All...
I am still fighting with this issue. It may be something which is not
properly implemented, and if that is the case, that is fine.
I am still trying to understand what is the real space occupied by files
in a /cephfs filesystem, reported for example by a df.
Maybe I did not expla
sdmap e341 pool 'cephfs_dt' (5) object 'thisobjectdoesnotexist' ->
pg 5.28aa7f5a (5.35a) -> up ([24,21,15], p24) acting ([24,21,15], p24)
Is this expected? Are those PGs actually assigned to something it does
not exists?
Cheers
Goncalo
--
Goncalo Borges
Research Co
access the filesystem? For example, I can imagine situation where the
filesystem may be in read-only, for example.
TIA
Goncalo
--
Goncalo Borges
Research Computing
ARC Centre of Excellence for Particle Physics at the Terascale
School of Physics A28 | University of Sydney, NSW 2006
T: +61 2 9351
Hi Jan...
Thank for the reply.
Yes, I did an 'umount -l' but I was sure that no I/O was happening at
the time. So, I was almost 100% sure that there were no real incoherence
in terms of open files in the OS.
On 08/20/2015 07:31 PM, Jan Schermer wrote:
Just to clarify - you unmounted the fil
hit the OSD again all those open files will start working and if more
need to be opened it will start looking for them...
Jan
On 24 Aug 2015, at 03:07, Goncalo Borges wrote:
Hi Jan...
Thank for the reply.
Yes, I did an 'umount -l' but I was sure that no I/O was happening at the t
;down' and 'out'
Cheers
Goncalo
On 08/25/2015 01:06 PM, Shinobu wrote:
So what is the situation where you need to do:
# cd /var/lib/ceph/osd/ceph-23/current
# rm -Rf *
# df
(...)
I'm quite sure that is not normal.
Shinobu
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 9:41 AM, Go
Ceph Day events for Shanghai, Tokyo, and Melbourne should all
still be proceeding as planned, however. Feel free to contact me if
you have any questions about Ceph Days. Thanks.
--
Goncalo Borges
Research Computing
ARC Centre of Excellence for Particle Physics at the Terascale
School of Physics
should all
still be proceeding as planned, however. Feel free to contact me if
you have any questions about Ceph Days. Thanks.
On 08/26/2015 10:28 AM, nigel.d.willi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 26 Aug 2015, at 9:47 am, Goncalo Borges wrote:
I am interested in the Melbourne one.
Hi Gonçalo, where di
27 active+recovering+degraded+remapped
17 active+recovery_wait+degraded
8 active+remapped+backfilling
4 active+recovering+degraded
recovery io 521 MB/s, 170 objects/s
Cheers
Goncalo
--
Goncalo Borges
Research Computing
ARC Centre of
15 at 2:54 AM, Goncalo Borges
wrote:
Hey guys...
1./ I have a simple question regarding the appearance of degraded PGs.
First, for reference:
a. I am working with 0.94.2
b. I have 32 OSDs distributed in 4 servers, meaning that I have 8 OSD per
server.
c. Our cluster is set with 'osd po
t;mailto:ceph-users@lists.ceph.com>
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
_______
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
--
Goncalo Bo
pg dump_stuck stale | grep ^[12] | awk '{print $1}'`;
do ceph pg $pg query; done
ok
Error ENOENT: i don't have pgid 1.23
Error ENOENT: i don't have pgid 2.38b
(...)
--- * ---
6) Create the non existing PGs
# for pg in `ceph pg dump_stuck stale | grep ^[12] | awk '{print $
order to run them.
The reason for my email is to get some clarification on that.
Cheers
Quoting Shinobu Kinjo :
Anyhow this page would help you:
http://ceph.com/docs/master/cephfs/disaster-recovery/
Shinobu
- Original Message -
From: "Shinobu Kinjo"
To: "Gonc
pg dump_stuck stale | grep ^[12] | awk '{print $1}'`; do
ceph pg $pg query; done
ok
Error ENOENT: i don't have pgid 1.23
Error ENOENT: i don't have pgid 2.38b
(...)
--- * ---
6) Create the non existing PGs
# for pg in `ceph pg dump_stuck stale | grep ^[12] | awk '{print
e the one I've
created
The whole idea is, given a scenario where there is loss of data and
metadata, what can be done from the admin side to recover the cephfs.
Nevertheless, since this email thread is already long, I'll try to send
a new email more focused.
Cheers and Thanks for the
ephfs-table-tool reset commands but just one or two?
e./ In what circumstances we would do a reset of the filesystem with
'ceph fs reset cephfs --yes-i-really-mean-it'?
Thank you in Advance
Cheers
--
Goncalo Borges
Research Computing
ARC Centre of Excellence for Particle Physics at t
e a thoughts of what might be wrong? Or if there is
other info I can provide to ease the search for what it might be?
Thanks!
___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
--
Goncalo Bor
us,
replacing*
2015-09-25 11:09:53.675605 7f8eaa775700 1 mds.0.19
ms_verify_authorizer: cannot decode auth caps bl of length 0
--
Goncalo Borges
Research Computing
ARC Centre of Excellence for Particle Physics at the Terascale
School of Physics A28 | University of Sydney, NSW 2006
T: +6
I found a partial answer to some of the questions:
5./ My questions:
- Is there a simple command for me to check which sessions are
active? 'cephfs-table-tool 0 show session' does not seem to work
- Is there a way for me to cross check which sessions belong to
which clients (IPs)?
'
(...)
liblttng-ust.so.0 => /usr/lib64/liblttng-ust.so.0
(0x00337da0)
- To fix this, I had to set 'export HOME=/root' in
/usr/lib64/ceph/ceph_common.sh
Cheers
Goncalo
--
Goncalo Borges
Research Computing
ARC Centre of Excellence for Particle Physics at the Terasc
S clients to limit
the amount of memory they can use?
Cheers
Goncalo
--
Goncalo Borges
Research Computing
ARC Centre of Excellence for Particle Physics at the Terascale
School of Physics A28 | University of Sydney, NSW 2006
T: +61 2 93511937
___
cep
Hi Ken
Here it is:
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/13470
Cheers
G.
On 10/09/2015 02:58 AM, Ken Dreyer wrote:
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 7:46 PM, Goncalo Borges
wrote:
- Each time logrotate is executed, we received a daily notice with the
message
ibust[8241/8241]: Warning: HOME environment
ploy, see http://ceph.com/docs/master/install/install-ceph-deploy
___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
--
Goncalo Borges
Research Computing
ARC Centre of Excellence for Particle Physics at the Terascale
School o
715200
and I've decreased both by a factor of 4 but I kept seeing the same
behavior.
At this point, I do not have a clear idea why this is happening.
Cheers
Goncalo
On 10/03/2015 04:03 AM, Gregory Farnum wrote:
On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 1:57 AM, John Spray wrote:
On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 2:
:
Hi Goncalo,
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 6:51 AM, Goncalo Borges
wrote:
Hi Sage...
I've seen that the rh6 derivatives have been ruled out.
This is a problem in our case since the OS choice in our systems is,
somehow, imposed by CERN. The experiments software is certified for SL6 and
the trans
trying to query osds that have been lost and removed
from the cluster?
___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
--
Goncalo Borges
Research Computing
ARC Centre of Excellence for Part
tedly writes data to 8M
files. The cache make multiple write assimilate into single OSD
write
Ugh, of course. I don't see a tracker ticket for that, so I made one:
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/13569
-Greg
--
Goncalo Borges
Research Computing
ARC Centre of Excellence for Particle Phys
://github.com/blog/1840-improving-github-for-science
https://guides.github.com/activities/citable-code/
That would provide a unique / standard way to cite ceph project everywhere.
Cheers
--
Goncalo Borges
Research Computing
ARC Centre of Excellence for Particle Physics at the Terascale
School of
RPM build errors:
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.3TtsUK (%build)
I remember that systemd support was introduced in the latest infernalis
release, and I just wonder if that, somehow, breaks the backward
compatibility with older systems.
Cheers
Goncalo
--
Goncalo Borges
R
Well... I misinterpreted the error. It is not systemd related but selinux
related. I must be missing some selinux component. Will investigate better.
From: Goncalo Borges [goncalo.bor...@sydney.edu.au]
Sent: 13 November 2015 16:51
To: ceph-users
h.spec to avoid building debug packages which I do not really
need.
Cheers
Goncalo
On 11/13/2015 08:27 PM, Goncalo Borges wrote:
Well... I misinterpreted the error. It is not systemd related but selinux
related. I must be missing some selinux comp
t
# su ceph -s /bin/bash --session-command="ceph-disk activate /dev/sdh1"
Problem opening /dev/sdh for reading! Error is 13.
You must run this program as root or use sudo!
mount: only root can use "--options" option
ceph-disk: Mounting filesystem failed: Comman
he partition (WARNING:ceph-disk:Journal /dev/sdc3 was
not prepared with ceph-disk. Symlinking directly)
[1]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GUID_Partition_Table#Partition_type_GUIDs
--
-----
Adrien GILLARD
+33 (0)6 29 06 16 31
gilla
ld be available in Centos CR
repos. For Centos 7.1.1503, it provides libunwind-1.1-5.el7.x86_64)
http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7.1.1503/cr
Cheers
Goncalo
--
Goncalo Borges
Research Computing
ARC Centre of Excellence for Particle Physics at the Terascale
School of Physics A28 | University of Sydney
re in the same version?*
Thank you for your answers
Cheers
Goncalo
--
Goncalo Borges
Research Computing
ARC Centre of Excellence for Particle Physics at the Terascale
School of Physics A28 | University of Sydney, NSW 2006
T: +61 2 93511937
___
ceph-user
=
-1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
open("/usr/share/locale/en_US/LC_MESSAGES/attr.mo", O_RDONLY) = -1
ENOENT (No such file or directory)
open("/usr/share/locale/en.UTF-8/LC_MESSAGES/attr.mo", O_RDONLY) = -1
ENOENT (No such file or directory)
open("/usr/share/locale/en.
10.2.1-0.el7.x86_64.rpm
rbd-fuse-10.2.1-0.el7.x86_64.rpm
rbd-mirror-10.2.1-0.el7.x86_64.rpm
rbd-nbd-10.2.1-0.el7.x86_64.rpm
On 05/25/2016 07:45 AM, Gregory Farnum wrote:
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 6:04 PM, Goncalo Borges
wrote:
Dear All...
Our infrastructure is the following:
- We use C
(python27)$ make
(python27)$ make install
Cheers
G.
-- Goncalo Borges Research Computing ARC Centre of Excellence for
Particle Physics at the Terascale School of Physics A28 | University of
Sydney, NSW 2006 T: +61 2 93511937
___
ceph-users maili
e
[mds.rccephmds2]
host = rccephmds2
mds standby_for_rank = rccephmds
mds standby replay = true
Am I doing something particularly different than what is expected?
Cheers
G.
--
Goncalo Borges
Research Computing
ARC Centre of Excellence for Particle Physics at the Terascale
School of Phys
[Install]
WantedBy=ceph-mon.target
Am i the only one seeing the issue? Is it really an issue?
Cheers
G.
--
Goncalo Borges
Research Computing
ARC Centre of Excellence for Particle Physics at the Terascale
School of Physics A28 | University of Sydney, NSW 2006
T: +6
2235 & v27 here ?
how to solve this problem ?
Regards,
XiuCai.
___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
--
Goncalo Borges
Research Computing
ARC Centre of Excellence for Particle
Cheers
G
On 06/28/2016 01:40 PM, Goncalo Borges wrote:
Hi XiuCai
Shouldn't you have, at least, 2 mons?
Cheers
G.
On 06/28/2016 01:12 PM, 秀才 wrote:
Hi,
ther are 1 mon and 7 osds in my cluster now.
but it seems something wrong, because `rbd -p test reate pet --size
1024` could not retu
Dear Cephers...
Today our ceph cluster gave us a couple of scrub errors regarding inconsistent
pgs. We just upgraded from 9.2.0 to 10.2.2 two days ago.
# ceph health detail
HEALTH_ERR 2 pgs inconsistent; 2 scrub errors; crush map has legacy tunables
(require bobtail, min is firefly)
pg 6.39c i
te": "INACTIVE",
"scrubber.start": "MIN",
"scrubber.end": "MIN",
"scrubber.subset_last_update": "0'0",
"scrubber.deep": false,
&q
changing on the fly.
Does this make sense?
G.
From: Shinobu Kinjo [shinobu...@gmail.com]
Sent: 30 June 2016 15:10
To: Goncalo Borges
Cc: ceph-us...@ceph.com
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] object size changing after a pg repair
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 1:48
Hi Greg
Opened this one
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16567
Let us see what they say.
Cheers
G.
On 07/01/2016 04:09 AM, Gregory Farnum wrote:
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 10:50 PM, Goncalo Borges
wrote:
Hi Shinobu
Sorry probably I don't understand your question properly.
Is what y
5 heartbeatmap
1/ 5 perfcounter
1/ 5 rgw
1/10 civetweb
1/ 5 javaclient
1/ 5 asok
1/ 1 throttle
0/ 0 refs
1/ 5 xio
1/ 5 compressor
1/ 5 newstore
1/ 5 bluestore
1/ 5 bluefs
1/ 3 bdev
1/ 5 kstore
4/
e code and
recompile. Is this something safe to do?
Cheers
Goncalo
On 07/05/2016 01:34 PM, Patrick Donnelly wrote:
Hi Goncalo,
I believe this segfault may be the one fixed here:
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10027
(Sorry for brief top-post. Im on mobile.)
On Jul 4, 2016 9:16 PM, "
, 2016 9:16 PM, "Goncalo Borges"
wrote:
Dear All...
We have recently migrated all our ceph infrastructure from 9.2.0 to
10.2.2.
We are currently using ceph-fuse to mount cephfs in a number of clients.
ceph-fuse 10.2.2 client is segfaulting in some situations. One of the
scenarios where
lock functions in two specific lines of src/client/Client.cc which, I
imagine, were also not there in 9.2.0 (unless there was a big rewrite of
src/client/Client.cc from 9.2.0 to 10.2.2)
Cheers
Goncalo
On 07/05/2016 02:45 PM, Goncalo Borges wrote:
Hi Brad, Shinobu, Patrick...
Indeed if I run
es
Anything else? Best practice?
P.S. I've done benchmarking: 3500 can support up to 16 10k-RPM HDD.
___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
--
Goncalo Borges
Research Computing
My previous email did not go through because of its size. Here goes a
new attempt:
Cheers
Goncalo
--- * ---
Hi Patrick, Brad...
Unfortunately, the other user application breaks ceph-fuse again (It is
a completely different application then in my previous test).
We have tested it in 4 machi
rick Donnelly wrote:
On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 2:01 AM, Goncalo Borges
wrote:
Unfortunately, the other user application breaks ceph-fuse again (It is a
completely different application then in my previous test).
We have tested it in 4 machines with 4 cores. The user is submitting 16
single cor
calo 20 0 1594m 83m 19m R 100.2 0.2 1:05.57 python
29312 goncalo 20 0 1594m 83m 19m R 99.9 0.2 1:05.01 python
31979 goncalo 20 0 1595m 82m 19m R 100.2 0.2 1:04.82 python
29333 goncalo 20 0 1594m 82m 19m R 99.5 0.2 1:04.94 python
29609 goncalo 20
On 07/11/2016 05:04 PM, Goncalo Borges wrote:
Hi John...
Thank you for replying.
Here is the result of the tests you asked but I do not see nothing
abnormal. Actually, your suggestions made me see that:
1) ceph-fuse 9.2.0 is presenting the same behaviour but with less
memory consumption
ectcacher = 20'
Cheers
Goncalo
From: Gregory Farnum [gfar...@redhat.com]
Sent: 12 July 2016 03:07
To: Goncalo Borges
Cc: John Spray; ceph-users
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] ceph-fuse segfaults ( jewel 10.2.2)
Oh, is this one of your custom-built packages? A
ns will solve our problem.
Does this make sense?
The compilation takes a while but I will update the issue once I have
finished this last experiment (in the next few days)
Cheers
Goncalo
On 07/12/2016 09:45 PM, Goncalo Borges wrote:
Hi All...
Thank you for continuing to follow this alrea
your patch.
Will report here afterwards.
Thanks for the feedback.
Cheers
Goncalo
On 07/15/2016 01:19 PM, Yan, Zheng wrote:
On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Goncalo Borges
wrote:
Hi All...
I've seen that Zheng, Brad, Pat and Greg already updated or made some
comments on the bug issue.
/ googling for tips, I saw an issue claiming that
'fuse_disable_pagecache' should be set to true in ceph.conf. Can you
briefly explain is this is correct and what is the con of not using it?
(just or me to understand it).
Thank you in Advance
Cheers
Goncalo
On 07/15/2016 01:3
;: 0,
"dne": 0,
"incomplete": 0,
"last_epoch_started": 1016,
"hit_set_history": {
"current_last_update": "0'0",
"history": []
}
},
{
"peer":
ortbitwise flag during update? If YES, try to unset it. I
faced with same problem when upgrade my ceph cluster from Hummer to
Jewel. Maybe it's your: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16113
Среда, 20 июля 2016, 8:42 +05:00 от Goncalo Borges
:
Hi All...
Today we had a warning r
p_ osds are (i guess) the
new ones it tries to use. However, in this new _up_ set, there is
always one osd with the near full message.
Maybe that is why re balancing is on hold?
Maybe if I increase the thresold for the warning the rebalance will restart?
Cheers
G.
On 07/20/2016 01:42 PM, Gonc
Hi Swami.
Did not make any difference.
Cheers
G.
On 07/20/2016 03:31 PM, M Ranga Swami Reddy wrote:
can you restart osd.32 and check the status?
Thanks
Swami
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 9:12 AM, Goncalo Borges
wrote:
Hi All...
Today we had a warning regarding 8 near full osd. Looking to
Hi Kostis
This is a wild guess but one thing I note is that your pool 179 has a very low
pg number (100).
Maybe the algorithm behind the new tunable need a higher pg number to actually
proceed with the recovery?
You could try to increase the pgs to 128 (it is always better to use powers of
2
.
Thanks for the help
Goncalo
From: Christian Balzer [ch...@gol.com]
Sent: 20 July 2016 19:36
To: ceph-us...@ceph.com
Cc: Goncalo Borges
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] pgs stuck unclean after reweight
Hello,
On Wed, 20 Jul 2016 13:42:20 +1000 Goncalo Borges wrote
, it doesn't seem I am able to change this value.
Can someone clarify exactly what is the happening here?
Cheers
G.
--
Goncalo Borges
Research Computing
ARC Centre of Excellence for Particle Physics at the Terascale
School of Physics A28 | University of Sydney, NSW 2006
T: +61 2 93511937
_
Hi Brad
Thanks for replying.
Answers inline.
I am a bit confused about the 'unchachable' message we get in Jewel 10.2.2
when I try to change some cluster configs.
For example:
1./ if I try to change mon_osd_nearfull_ratio from 0.85 to 0.90, I get
# ceph tell mon.* injectargs "--mon_osd
last_osdmap_epoch 2546
last_pg_scan 2546
full_ratio 0.95
*nearfull_ratio 0.85*
Cheers
G.
On 07/26/2016 12:39 PM, Brad Hubbard wrote:
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 12:16:35PM +1000, Goncalo Borges wrote:
Hi Brad
Thanks for replying.
Answers inline.
I am a bit confused about the 'unchach
Hi cephers...
Our production cluster is running Jewel 10.2.2.
We were running a production cluster with 8 servers each with 8 osds making a
gran total of 64 osds. Each server also hosts 2 ssds for journals. Each sshd
supports 4 journals.
We had 1/3 of our osds above 80% occupied, and we decid
the
10.100.1.0/24 being blocked.
I think i had the firewall disabled when I bootstrapped the osds in the
machines and that might explain why there was some transfer of data.
Sorry for the entropy.
Cheers
G.
On 07/27/2016 08:44 AM, Goncalo Borges wrote:
Hi cephers...
Our production
to mitigate it.
It is also worthwhile to mention that this seems to happen while we are
adding a new storage server to the underlying ceph infrastructure, so
there was some data movement happening in the background.
Any suggestion on how to mitigate it?
Cheers
Goncalo and Sean
--
Gon
lem. In this way you force ceph-fuse to
read directly from osds, right?!
We understand about the performance issues that it might imply but we
are more concerned in having data coherence in the client.
Thoughts?
Cheers
--
Goncalo Borges
Research Computing
ARC Centre of Excellence for Particle P
David wrote:
Try:
ceph pg set_nearfull_ratio 0.9
On 26 Jul 2016 08:16, "Goncalo Borges" <mailto:goncalo.bor...@sydney.edu.au>> wrote:
Hello...
I do not think that these settings are working properly in jewel.
Maybe someone else can confirm.
So, to summarize:
Firewall or communication issues?
From: ceph-users [ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com] on behalf of M Ranga Swami
Reddy [swamire...@gmail.com]
Sent: 28 July 2016 22:00
To: ceph-users
Subject: [ceph-users] osd wrongly maked as down
Hello,
hello - I use 10
July 2016 06:54
To: Goncalo Borges
Cc: ceph-us...@ceph.com
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] ceph-fuse (jewel 10.2.2): No such file or directory
issues
On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 6:37 PM, Goncalo Borges
wrote:
> Hi Greg
>
> Thanks for replying. Answer inline.
>
>
>
>>> Dear cephfs
Dear cephers.
I would like to request some clarification on migrating from legacy to optimal
(jewel) tunables.
We have recently migrated from infernalis to Jewel. However, we are still using
legacy tunables.
All our ceph infrastructure (mons. odss and mdss) are running 10.2.2 in Centos
7.2.15
ceph --version
ceph version 10.2.2-1-g502540f (502540faf67308fa595e03f9f446b4ba67df731d)
Any suggestion would be helpful.
Thanks.
Daleep Singh Bais
___________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-c
chooseleaf_vary_r=5 and
then decrease it slowly to 1?)
- then from firefly to hammer
- then from hammer to jewel
2) or going directly to jewel tunables?
Any advise on how to minimize the data movement?
TIA
Goncalo
--
Goncalo Borges
Research Computing
ARC Centre of Excellence for Particle Physics at
arnum wrote:
On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 8:57 PM, Goncalo Borges
wrote:
Dear cephers...
I am looking for some advice on migrating from legacy tunables to Jewel
tunables.
What would be the best strategy?
1) A step by step approach?
- starting with the transition from bobtail to firefly (and, in
_
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
--
Goncalo Borges
Research Computing
ARC Centre of Excellence for Particle Physics at the Terascale
School of Physics A28 | University of Sydney, NSW 20
-rw-r--r--1 ceph ceph 0 Aug 9 09:51
scrub\u6.107__head_0107__fff8
But it is empty..
Thanks!
On 09/08/16 04:33, Goncalo Borges wrote:
Hi Kenneth...
The previous default behavior of 'ceph pg repair' was to copy the pg
objects from the primary osd to others. Not sure i
Hi Willi
If you are using ceph-fuse, to enable quota, you need to pass "--client-quota"
option in the mount operation.
Cheers
Goncalo
From: ceph-users [ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com] on behalf of Willi Fehler
[willi.feh...@t-online.de]
Sent: 13 August
Hi HP.
I am just a site admin so my opinion should be validated by proper support staff
Seems really similar to
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/14399
The ticket speaks about timezone difference between osds. Maybe it is something
worthwhile to check?
Cheers
Goncalo
The ticket I mentioned earlier was marked as a duplicate of
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/9732
Cheers
Goncalo
From: ceph-users [ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com] on behalf of Goncalo
Borges [goncalo.bor...@sydney.edu.au]
Sent: 13 August 2016 22:23
To: Hein-Pieter van Braam; ceph-users
ferent even if now is ok.
It should be worthwhile to check if timezone is/was different in mind.
Cheers
From: Hein-Pieter van Braam [h...@tmm.cx]
Sent: 13 August 2016 22:42
To: Goncalo Borges; ceph-users
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Cascading failure on a plac
To: Goncalo Borges; ceph-users
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Cascading failure on a placement group
Hi,
The timezones on all my systems appear to be the same, I just verified
it by running 'date' on all my boxes.
- HP
On Sat, 2016-08-13 at 12:36 +0000, Goncalo Borges wrote:
> The ti
Hi cephfers
I have a really simple question: the documentation always refers to the
procedure to substitute failed disks. Currently I have a predicted failure in a
raid 0 osd and I would like to substitute before it fails without having to go
by replicating pgs once the osd is removed from crus
users [ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com] on behalf of Goncalo
Borges [goncalo.bor...@sydney.edu.au]
Sent: Sunday, August 14, 2016 5:47 AM
To: ceph-us...@ceph.com
Subject: [ceph-users] Substitute a predicted failure (not yet failed) osd
Hi cephfers
I have a really simple question: the documentation
@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
--
Goncalo Borges
Research Computing
ARC Centre of Excellence for Particle Physics at the Terascale
School of Physics A28 | University of Sydney, NSW 2006
T: +61 2 93511937
___
ceph-users
down-peering-failure
[2]
http://docs.ceph.com/docs/master/rados/troubleshooting/troubleshooting-pg/
On 08/16/2016 11:42 AM, Heller, Chris wrote:
Output of `ceph pg dump_stuck`
# ceph pg dump_stuck
ok
pg_stat state up up_primary acting acting_primary
4.2a8 down+peering
it returns to the network?
-Chris
*From: *Goncalo Borges
*Date: *Monday, August 15, 2016 at 11:36 PM
*To: *"Heller, Chris" ,
"ceph-users@lists.ceph.com"
*Subject: *Re: [ceph-users] PG is in 'stuck unclean' state, but all
acting OSD are up
Hi Chris...
The precis
shows and I get kicked out of the ceph-fuse
mount until I remount.
Any suggestions?
With regards,
___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
--
Goncalo Borges
Research Computing
ARC
uot;last_scrub_stamp": "2016-08-24 22:59:27.749260",
"last_deep_scrub": "16645'96391",
"last_deep_scrub_stamp": "2016-08-22 20:21:59.567449",
"last_clean_scrub_stamp": "2016-08-24 22:59:27.
in a discussion last
time of exactly the same issue experienced by someone else in jewel
Cheers
Goncalo
From: Brad Hubbard [bhubb...@redhat.com]
Sent: 30 August 2016 17:13
To: Goncalo Borges
Cc: ceph-us...@ceph.com
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] cephfs metadata
1 - 100 of 163 matches
Mail list logo
