[ceph-users] Cluster not recovering after OSD deamon is down

2016-05-03 Thread Gaurav Bafna
True max open files=65536 objecter inflight ops=2048 osd pool default pg num=512 log to syslog = true #err to syslog = true Thanks & Regards Gaurav Bafna 9540631400 ___ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

[ceph-users] Cluster not recovering after OSD deamon is down

2016-05-03 Thread Gaurav Bafna
True max open files=65536 objecter inflight ops=2048 osd pool default pg num=512 log to syslog = true #err to syslog = true -- Gaurav Bafna 9540631400 ___ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

Re: [ceph-users] Cluster not recovering after OSD deamon is down

2016-05-03 Thread Gaurav Bafna
at least three. > > On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 8:42 AM, Gaurav Bafna wrote: >> >> Hi Cephers, >> >> I am running a very small cluster of 3 storage and 2 monitor nodes. >> >> After I kill 1 osd-daemon, the cluster never recovers fully. 9 PGs >> remain unde

Re: [ceph-users] Cluster not recovering after OSD deamon is down

2016-05-03 Thread Gaurav Bafna
last_user_version": 0, "last_backfill": "MAX", "purged_snaps": "[]", "history": { "epoch_created": 13, "last_epoch_started": 818, "last_epoch_clean": 818, "last_ep

Re: [ceph-users] Cluster not recovering after OSD deamon is down

2016-05-03 Thread Gaurav Bafna
> On Tuesday 03 May 2016 06:56 PM, Gaurav Bafna wrote: >> Also , the old PGs are not mapped to the down osd as seen from the >> ceph health detail >> >> pg 5.72 is active+undersized+degraded, acting [16,49] >> pg 5.4e is active+undersized+degraded, acting [16,38] >

Re: [ceph-users] 2 pg in 'active+undersized+degraded' state

2016-05-11 Thread Gaurav Bafna
4a > > osdmap e105161 pg 24.54a (24.54a) -> up [8,19] acting [8,19] > > > > The osd tree and crushmap can be found here: http://pastebin.com/i4BQq5Mi > > > > I’m hoping for some insight into why this is happening. I couldn’t find much > out there on the net about u

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph Recovery

2016-05-16 Thread Gaurav Bafna
s >> > same >> > > > with >> > > > > total undersized PGs, does it mean that all PGs have at least one >> > good >> > > > > replica, so I can just mark lost or remove down OSD, reformat again >> > and >> > > > > then restart them if there is no hardware issue with HDDs? Which one >> > of >> > > > PGs >> > > > > status should I pay more attention, degraded or undersized due to >> > lost >> > > > > object possibility? >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > Yes. Your system is not reporting any inactive, unfound or stale PGs, >> > so >> > > > that is good news. >> > > > >> > > > However, I recommend that you wait for the system to become fully >> > > > active+clean before you start removing any OSDs or formatting hard >> > drives. >> > > > Better be safe than sorry. >> > > > >> > > > Wido >> > > > >> > > > > Best regards, >> > > > > ___ >> > > > > ceph-users mailing list >> > > > > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com >> > > > > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com >> > > > >> > > ___ > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com -- Gaurav Bafna 9540631400 ___ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph Recovery

2016-05-16 Thread Gaurav Bafna
ith good one, > one by one OSD. I have done with that successfully. > > Best regards, > > On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 12:30 PM, Gaurav Bafna wrote: >> >> Even I faced the same issue with our production cluster . >> >> cluster fac04d85-db48-4564-b821-deebda04626

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph Recovery

2016-05-17 Thread Gaurav Bafna
Best regards, > > On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 12:49 PM, Gaurav Bafna wrote: >> >> Hi Lazuardi >> >> No, there are no unfound or incomplete PGs. >> >> Replacing the osds surely makes the cluster health. But the problem >> should not have occurred in the fir

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph Recovery

2016-05-18 Thread Gaurav Bafna
ty to find whether this is an issue or not. Thanks On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 9:37 PM, Lazuardi Nasution wrote: > Hi Gaurav, > > It could be an issue. But, I never see crush map removal without recovery. > > Best regards, > > On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 1:41 PM, Gaurav Bafna wrote: &

[ceph-users] rgw s3website issue

2016-05-29 Thread Gaurav Bafna
9700 1 == req done req=0x7ff404ff37d0 op status=0 http_status=405 == Code wise I see that put_op is not defined for RGWHandler_REST_S3Website class but is defined for RGWHandler_REST_Bucket_S3 class . Can somebody please help me out ? --

Re: [ceph-users] rgw s3website issue

2016-05-30 Thread Gaurav Bafna
s the resolve actually happen ? Does it need to listen on port number 80 too ? Thanks a lot for your time, Gaurav On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 5:54 AM, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 05:17:14PM +0530, Gaurav Bafna wrote: >> Hi Cephers, >> >> I am unable to create bu