> Op 18 februari 2017 om 17:03 schreef rick stehno :
>
>
> I work for Seagate and have done over a hundred of tests using SMR 8TB disks
> in a cluster. It all depends on what your access is if SMR hdd would be the
> best choice. Remember SMR hdd don't perform well doing random writes, but are
Please open ticket at http://tracker.ceph.com, if you haven't yet.
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 6:07 PM, Muthusamy Muthiah
wrote:
> Hi Wido,
>
> Thanks for the information and let us know if this is a bug.
> As workaround we will go with small bluestore_cache_size to 100MB.
>
> Thanks,
> Muthu
>
> On
On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 2:55 PM, Noah Watkins wrote:
> The least intrusive solution is to simply change the sandbox to allow
> the standard file system module loading function as expected. Then any
> user would need to make sure that every OSD had consistent versions of
> dependencies installed us
Hi Sage and Jason,
My company is building backup system based on rbd export-diff and
import-diff cmds.
However, in recent test we found some strange behaviors of cmd export-diff.
long words in short: sometimes repeatedly executing rbd export-diff
–from-snap snap1 image@snap2 -|md5sum, and md5sum
BTW, we used hammer version with the following fix. the issue is also
reported by us during the former backup testing.
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/12218/files
librbd: diffs to clone's first snapshot should include parent diffs
Zhongyan
On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 11:13 AM, Zhongyan Gu wrote:
Hello,
On Thu, 16 Feb 2017 17:51:18 +0200 Kostis Fardelas wrote:
> Hello,
> we are on Debian Jessie and Hammer 0.94.9 and recently we decided to
> upgrade our kernel from 3.16 to 4.9 (jessie-backports). We experience
> the same regression but with some shiny points
Same OS, kernels and Ceph ver
Hello Shinobu,
We already raised ticket for this issue. FYI -
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/18924
Thanks
Jayaram
On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 12:36 AM, Shinobu Kinjo wrote:
> Please open ticket at http://tracker.ceph.com, if you haven't yet.
>
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 6:07 PM, Muthusamy Muthiah
Hi All,
Pretend I'm about to upgrade from one Ceph release to another. I want
to know that the cluster is healthy enough to sanely upgrade (MONs
quorate, no OSDs actually on fire), but don't care about HEALTH_WARN
issues like "too many PGs per OSD" or "crush map has legacy tunables".
In this cas
