Thank you Joao and Gregory!
I will investigate whether we can use the mon_osd_reporter_subtree_level option.
Ilia
___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
On 02/03/17 19:54, David Turner wrote:
> Our current solution in Hammer involves a daemon monitoring the
> cluster load and setting the osd_snap_trim_sleep accordingly between 0
> and 0.35 which does a good job of preventing IO blocking and help us
> to clear out the snap_trim_q each day. These se
Yes, we will be able to test the modifications to master. We should be able
to wait for Luminous as our next production upgrade if it means getting
this patch.
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 12:09 PM Samuel Just wrote:
> Ok, I'm still working on a branch for master that will introduce limiter
> on how m
Hello,
On Sun, 5 Feb 2017 02:03:57 +0100 Marc Roos wrote:
>
>
> I have a 3 node test cluster with one osd per node. And I write a file
> to a pool with size 1. Why doesn’t ceph just use the full 110MB/s of
> the network (as with default rados bench test)? Does ceph 'reserve'
> bandwidth fo
I accidentally responded from the wrong email address. We will be able to build
off of master and test that.
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 5, 2017, at 3:27 PM, Peter Maloney
mailto:peter.malo...@brockmann-consult.de>>
wrote:
On 02/03/17 19:54, David Turner wrote:
Our current solution in Hammer i
