[Reduced to ceph-users, this isn't community related]
Hello,
On Sat, 6 Aug 2016 20:23:41 +0530 Venkata Manojawa Paritala wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have configured single Ceph cluster in a lab with the below
> specification.
>
> 1. Divided the cluster into 3 logical sites (SiteA, SiteB & SiteC). Thi
On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 6:56 PM, Christian Balzer wrote:
>
> [Reduced to ceph-users, this isn't community related]
>
> Hello,
>
> On Sat, 6 Aug 2016 20:23:41 +0530 Venkata Manojawa Paritala wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> We have configured single Ceph cluster in a lab with the below
>> specification.
>>
>>
I created a new pool that only contains OSDs on a single node. The Rados
bench gives me the speed I'd expect (1GB/s...all coming out of cache)
I then created a pool that contains OSDs from 2 nodes. Now the strange part
is, if I run the Rados bench from either of those nodes, I get the speed
I'd ex
> I'm confused. How can a 4M discard not free anything? It's either
> going to hit an entire object or two adjacent objects, truncating the
> tail of one and zeroing the head of another. Using rbd diff:
>
> $ rbd diff test | grep -A 1 25165824
> 25165824 4194304 data
> 29360128 4194304 data
>
On Friday, August 5, 2016, matthew patton wrote:
> > - ESXI's VMFS5 is aligned on 1MB, so 4MB discards never actually free
> anything
>
> the proper solution here is to:
> * quit worrying about it and buy sufficient disk in the first place, it's
> not exactly expensive
> I would do that for one
