On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 10:27 PM, Florian Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 9:32 PM, Mark Nelson wrote:
>> On 02/18/2015 02:19 PM, Florian Haas wrote:
>>>
>>> Hey everyone,
>>>
>>> I must confess I'm still not fully understanding this problem and
>>> don't exactly know where to start digging
After the injection of the new monmap done. the monmap dump still reveal the
old one. The old one is not overwritten to the new one
Thanks,
Sunday Olutayo
Sadeeb Technologies Ltd
7 Mayegun Street, Ojo
Lagos State, Nigeria.
Tel: +234 1 7404524
D/L: +234 1 8169922
Cell: +234 8054600338,
I was trying to remove the (mon-node) without replacing it.
What really happen is this, I was adding a new mon-node after an initial
successful cluster setup with one mon-node
but addition was not successful and it already affected the monmap, trying to
remove with "ceph mon remove" or ceph-de
Hey cephers,
We're opening up our Ceph Tech Talks to the broader Ceph community.
So, for those of you who would like to attend and ask questions
in-person, the next one is a week from today!
http://ceph.com/ceph-tech-talks/
Last month Sam Just gave a great talk on the inner workings of RADOS,
an
Hi Sunday,
did you verify the contents of your monmap? In general, the procedure might
look something like this:
- ceph-mon -i --extract-monmap /tmp/monmap
- monmaptool --print /tmp/monmap
- monmaptool --rm --add
--clobber /tmp/monmap
- monmaptool --print /tmp/monmap
at this p
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 12:50 AM, Gregory Farnum wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 3:30 PM, Florian Haas wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 11:41 PM, Gregory Farnum wrote:
>>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 1:58 PM, Florian Haas wrote:
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 10:28 PM, Oliver Schulz wrote:
> D
On 02/18/2015 06:05 PM, "Sebastian Köhler [Alfahosting GmbH]" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> yesterday we had had the problem that one of our cluster clients
> remounted a rbd device in read-only mode. We found this[1] stack trace
> in the logs. We investigated further and found similar traces on all
> other ma
On Thu, 19 Feb 2015 05:56:46 PM Florian Haas wrote:
> As it is, a simple "perf top" basically hosing the system wouldn't be
> something that is generally considered expected.
Could the disk or controller be failing?
___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-user
Hello,
I have a cluster currently at 0.80.1 and would like to upgrade it to
0.80.7 (Debian as you can guess), but for a number of reasons I can't
really do it all at the same time.
In particular I would like to upgrade the primary monitor node first and
the secondary ones as well as the OSDs lat
Hi,
Intel has just released new ssd s3610:
http://www.anandtech.com/show/8954/intel-launches-ssd-dc-s3610-s3710-enterprise-ssds
endurance is 10x bigger than 3500, for 10% cost addition.
Has somebody already tested them ?
Regards,
Alexandre
___
ceph-
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 2:21 AM, Mike Christie wrote:
> On 02/18/2015 06:05 PM, "Sebastian Köhler [Alfahosting GmbH]" wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> yesterday we had had the problem that one of our cluster clients
>> remounted a rbd device in read-only mode. We found this[1] stack trace
>> in the logs. We in
11 matches
Mail list logo