[ceph-users] Advantages of using Ceph with LXC

2014-11-23 Thread Tony
What are a few advantages of using Ceph with LXC ? ___ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

Re: [ceph-users] Kernel memory allocation oops Centos 7

2014-11-23 Thread Bond, Darryl
Or perhaps not :( Had occasion to remove a server and allow a subsequent re-balance of the cluster today. The box with 3.17.3 (and without min_free_kbytes set) oopsed and the others on the stock kernel with the setting did not. Darryl From: Christian Bal

Re: [ceph-users] non-posix cephfs page deprecated

2014-11-23 Thread Gregory Farnum
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 6:32 PM, Shawn Edwards wrote: > This page is marked for removal: > > http://ceph.com/docs/firefly/dev/differences-from-posix/ I'm not quite sure what that TODO means, there, but > Is the bug in the above webpage still in the code? If not, in which version > was it fixed?

[ceph-users] paddles does not support more than 4 teuthology-worker ?

2014-11-23 Thread jhm0...@gmail.com
Hi all, I install and setup my paddles server following README.rst, when 5 teuthology-worker was started, one job connection will be reset. the log print as follows: 2014-11-21T22:50:34.281 INFO:teuthology.run:Found tasks at /root/src/ceph-qa-suite-master/tasks 2014-11-21T22:50:34.282 INF

Re: [ceph-users] Multiple MDS servers...

2014-11-23 Thread Gregory Farnum
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 3:21 PM, JIten Shah wrote: > I am trying to setup 3 MDS servers (one on each MON) but after I am done > setting up the first one, it give me below error when I try to start it on > the other ones. I understand that only 1 MDS is functional at a time, but I > thought you can

Re: [ceph-users] Multiple MDS servers...

2014-11-23 Thread JIten Shah
Hi Greg, I haven’t setup anything in ceph.conf as mds.cephmon002 nor in any ceph folders. I have always tried to set it up as mds.lab-cephmon002, so I am wondering where is it getting that value from? —Jiten On Nov 23, 2014, at 9:32 PM, Gregory Farnum wrote: > On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 3:21 PM

Re: [ceph-users] Kernel memory allocation oops Centos 7

2014-11-23 Thread Christian Balzer
On Mon, 24 Nov 2014 05:22:46 + Bond, Darryl wrote: > Or perhaps not :( > Had occasion to remove a server and allow a subsequent re-balance of the > cluster today. The box with 3.17.3 (and without min_free_kbytes set) > oopsed and the others on the stock kernel with the setting did not. > Well