Hi,
> > > That's strange. 3.13 is way before any changes that could have had any
such effect. Can you by any chance try with older kernels to see where
it starts misbehaving for you? 3.12? 3.10? 3.8?
If I have to compile Kernels anyway I will test 3.16.3 as well :-/.
Debian has relea
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 1:30 PM, Micha Krause wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> > > That's strange. 3.13 is way before any changes that could have had
>> any
such effect. Can you by any chance try with older kernels to see where
it starts misbehaving for you? 3.12? 3.10? 3.8?
>>>
>>>
>> If I
On Tue, 2014-09-30 at 00:30 +0900, Christian Balzer wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Sep 2014 11:15:21 +0200 Emmanuel Lacour wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 05:57:12PM +0900, Christian Balzer wrote:
> > >
> > > Given your SSDs, are they failing after more than 150TB have been
> > > written?
> >
> > betw
Using the S3 API to Object Gateway, let's say that I create an object named
"/some/path/foo.bar". When I browse this object in Ceph using a graphical
S3 client, "some" and "path" show up as directories. I realize that they're
not *actually* directories, but can I set an ACL on them, just like I can
Hi,
I'm using the radosgw REST API (via Python's boto library and also using
some radosgw-agent methods) to fetch some data from Ceph (version 0.85).
When I try to get the admin log for some specific dates, the radosgw seems
to give me bad results.
For example when I try to get entries since 201
Hi all,
I have very slow IO operations on my cluster when i stop a node for
maintenance.
I know my cluster can support the charge with only 2 on my 4 nodes.
I set the noout flag with "ceph osd set noout"
From my understanding, stop only one CEPH node should not have big issue.
BUT when i dow
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 5:25 PM, Sage Weil wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Sep 2014, Florian Haas wrote:
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> Just thought I'd circle back on some discussions I've had with people
>> earlier in the year:
>>
>> Shortly before firefly, snapshot support for CephFS clients was
>> effectively d
On Tue, 30 Sep 2014 15:26:31 +0100 Kingsley Tart wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-09-30 at 00:30 +0900, Christian Balzer wrote:
> > On Mon, 29 Sep 2014 11:15:21 +0200 Emmanuel Lacour wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 05:57:12PM +0900, Christian Balzer wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Given your SSDs, are they
On our dev cluster, I've got a PG that won't create. We had a host fail
with 10 OSDs that needed to be rebuilt. A number of other OSDs were down
for a few days (did I mention this was a dev cluster?). The other OSDs
eventually came up once the OSD maps caught up on them. I rebuilt the OSDs
on all t
Yeah, the "last acting" set there is probably from prior to your lost
data and forced pg creation, so it might not have any bearing on
what's happening now.
Software Engineer #42 @ http://inktank.com | http://ceph.com
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Robert LeBlanc wrote:
> I rebuilt the primar
Hello all,
I installed OpenStack with Glance + Ceph OSD with replication factor 2 and
now I can see the write operations are extremly slow.
For example, I can see only 0.04 MB/s write speed when I run rados bench
with 512b blocks:
rados bench -p test 60 write --no-cleanup -t 1 -b 512
Maintainin
Sending this again, because it wasn't published to the mailing list (I
think because I wasn't a subscriber).
Hi,
I'm using the radosgw REST API (via Python's boto library and also using
some radosgw-agent methods) to fetch some data from Ceph (version 0.85).
When I try to get the admin log for s
On 09/29/2014 03:58 AM, Dan Van Der Ster wrote:
Hi Emmanuel,
This is interesting, because we’ve had sales guys telling us that those Samsung
drives are definitely the best for a Ceph journal O_o !
Our sales guys or Samsung sales guys? :) If it was ours, let me know.
The conventional wisdom
On Tuesday, September 30, 2014, Robert LeBlanc wrote:
> On our dev cluster, I've got a PG that won't create. We had a host fail
> with 10 OSDs that needed to be rebuilt. A number of other OSDs were down
> for a few days (did I mention this was a dev cluster?). The other OSDs
> eventually came up
I rebuilt the primary OSD (29) in the hopes it would unblock whatever it
was, but no luck. I'll check the admin socket and see if there is anything
I can find there.
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 10:36 AM, Gregory Farnum wrote:
> On Tuesday, September 30, 2014, Robert LeBlanc
> wrote:
>
>> On our dev
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Steve Kingsland
wrote:
> Using the S3 API to Object Gateway, let's say that I create an object named
> "/some/path/foo.bar". When I browse this object in Ceph using a graphical S3
> client, "some" and "path" show up as directories. I realize that they're not
> actu
Le 30/09/2014 22:55, Patrick McGarry a écrit :
Hey cephers,
The schedule and call for blueprints is now up for our next CDS as we
aim for the Hammer release:
http://ceph.com/community/ceph-developer-summit-hammer/
If you have any work that you plan on submitting through the end of
the year, p
Hey cephers,
The schedule and call for blueprints is now up for our next CDS as we
aim for the Hammer release:
http://ceph.com/community/ceph-developer-summit-hammer/
If you have any work that you plan on submitting through the end of
the year, please fill out a Blueprint (the big red button) as
Hello
i'm new user with ceph, maybe someone can help, i was install 0.85 ceph
version,
setup mon osd and radosgw for s3 api.
When i upload object like *.mp3 *.exe *.psd alright, objects have a owner,
but if i upload any image like jpg png gif, object have no owner, and i
couldn't set acl public_rea
Hi Ceph developers,
Last stable Firefly release (v0.80.5) was tagged on July 29 (over 2
months ago). Since then, there were twice as many commits merged into
the firefly branch than there existed on the branch before v0.80.5:
$ git log --oneline --no-merges v0.80..v0.80.5|wc -l
122
$ git log --on
Hello,
[reduced to ceph-users]
On Sat, 27 Sep 2014 19:17:22 +0400 Timur Nurlygayanov wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I installed OpenStack with Glance + Ceph OSD with replication factor 2
> and now I can see the write operations are extremly slow.
> For example, I can see only 0.04 MB/s write speed wh
Hi All,
I'm working on integrating our new Ceph cluster with our older
OpenStack infrastructure. It's going pretty well so far but looking
to check my expectations.
We're running Firefly on the ceph side and Icehouse on the OpenStack
side. I've pulled the recommnded nova branch from
https://git
Hi,
Unfortunately this is expected.
If you take a snapshot you should not expect a clone but a RBD snapshot.
Please see this BP:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/implement-rbd-snapshots-instead-of-qemu-snapshots
A major part of the code is ready, however we missed nova-specs feature
23 matches
Mail list logo
