Thanks John,
I really mean my files are too small for HDFS, as the majority of them will
be under 64M, which I think is (still?) the default HDFS block size, *and
also,* they will be very numerous.
As such, they would quickly consume a huge aggregate amount of RAM on the
HDFS name node, which is
On Sat, Aug 2, 2014 at 1:41 AM, Christopher O'Connell
wrote:
> So I've been having a seemingly similar problem and while trying to follow
> the steps in this thread, things have gone very south for me.
Show me where in this thread have I said to set tunables to optimal ;)
optimal (== firefly for
On Sat, Aug 2, 2014 at 10:03 PM, Christopher O'Connell
wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 2, 2014 at 6:27 AM, Ilya Dryomov
> wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Aug 2, 2014 at 1:41 AM, Christopher O'Connell
>> wrote:
>> > So I've been having a seemingly similar problem and while trying to
>> > follow
>> > the steps in this
Hi Ilya,
Short of building a 3.14 kernel from scratch, are there any centos/EL
kernels of 3.14 but less than 3.15?
Is the fix in 3.15 yet? I just installed 3.15.8.
All the best,
~ Christopher
Al
On Sat, Aug 2, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Ilya Dryomov
wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 2, 2014 at 10:03 PM, Christo
To be more clear on my question, we currently use ELRepo for those rare
occasions when we need a 3.x kernel on centos. Are you aware of anyone
maintaining a 3.14 kernel.
On Sat, Aug 2, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Christopher O'Connell
wrote:
> Hi Ilya,
>
> Short of building a 3.14 kernel from scratch, are
Yes I looked at tcpdump on each of the OSDs and saw communications between all
3 OSDs before I sent my first question to this list. When I disabled selinux on
the one offending server based on your feedback (typically we have this
disabled on lab systems that are only on the lab net) the 10 page
