On 01/07/2014 08:41 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
On 01/07/2014 08:15 AM, raj kumar wrote:
I meant could not find required jar files to run java swift program.
I don't think nobody has a clue of what you mean.
^
anybody
Ceph is completely written in C++, so
Hi David,
Am 07.01.2014 01:19, schrieb David Zafman:
Did the inconsistent flag eventually get cleared? It might have been you
didn’t wait long enough for the repair to get through the pg.
No, the flag did not clear automatically. But after restarting a few osds the
issue was resolved.
C
Hi all,
I tried to apply custom ACL(only Read) on an s3 bucket created. The rules
seems to have got applied. But it looks the ACL's not getting honored.
when I use getacl, I get the result.
===
Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[Grantee] => Array
(
Hi,
when I designed a ceph cluster nobody talked about radosgw, it was RBD
only. Now we are thinking about adding radosgw, and I have some concern
when it comes to the number of PG's per OSD (which will grow beyond the
50-100 recommended PG's).
According to:
http://ceph.com/docs/master/rados/opera
On 01/07/2014 05:14 AM, Christian Balzer wrote:
Hello,
I previously created a test cluster using the Argonaut packages available
in Debian testing aka Jessie (atm).
Since it was pointed out to me that I ought to play with something more
recent, I bumped the machines to sid, which has 0.72.2 pac
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 7:47 AM, Joao Eduardo Luis wrote:
> On 01/07/2014 05:14 AM, Christian Balzer wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I previously created a test cluster using the Argonaut packages available
>> in Debian testing aka Jessie (atm).
>> Since it was pointed out to me that I ought to play w
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 2:40 AM, Jaseer Tk wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I tried to apply custom ACL(only Read) on an s3 bucket created. The rules
> seems to have got applied. But it looks the ACL's not getting honored.
>
> when I use getacl, I get the result.
> ===
>
> Array
> (
> [0] => Array
>
I have 4 PGs stuck inactive.
I have tried everything I can find online, and could use some help.
I had 3 OSDs... was in process of rebooting one and another totally crashed and
corrupted its filesystem (BAD).
So now I have 4 incomplete PGs.
Things I've tried:
Rebooting all OSDs.
Run
Assuming the one who lost its filesystem is totally gone, mark it
lost. That will tell the OSDs to give up on whatever data it might
have had and you should be good to go (modulo whatever data you might
have lost from only having it on the dead OSD during the reboot).
-Greg
Software Engineer #42 @
Oh, sorry, you did do that. Hrm.
What osdmap epoch did your lost node (0, I assume) disappear in? What
version of Ceph are you running? That pg stat isn't making a lot of
sense to me.
Software Engineer #42 @ http://inktank.com | http://ceph.com
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 2:45 PM, Gregory Farnum wro
Thanks in advance for your help, and time...
ceph 0.67.4
It's been a long battle, and I don't really know what I'm doing (first ceph
cluster.ever)so here goes.
Iv'e been testing with btrfs, been having lots of problems too. But ceph was
resilient and kept working. (I still think its
I'd like to add that I have "blocked requests" that are around 1 seconds
old
Can I just force the pgs onlinedata or not?
- Original Message -
From: "Bryan Morris"
To: ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 7, 2014 5:44:06 PM
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] 4 PGs st
Hello,
On Tue, 07 Jan 2014 12:47:02 + Joao Eduardo Luis wrote:
> On 01/07/2014 05:14 AM, Christian Balzer wrote:
[snip]
> >
> > Is this the expected state of affairs, as in:
> > 1. The current Debian Sid package can't create a new cluster by itself
> > 2. ceph-deploy from ceph.com isn't avai
Hello,
On Tue, 7 Jan 2014 08:35:44 -0500 Alfredo Deza wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 7:47 AM, Joao Eduardo Luis
> wrote:
> > On 01/07/2014 05:14 AM, Christian Balzer wrote:
> >>
[snip]
> >> So I grabbed the latest ceph-deploy,
> >> ceph-deploy_1.3.4-1~bpo70+1_all.deb, and tried that, but as I
nope, doesn't work...
I have an admin user... with the right caps.
{ "user_id": "admin2",
"display_name": "Admin 2admin",
"email": "",
"suspended": 0,
"max_buckets": 1000,
"auid": 0,
"subusers": [],
"keys": [
{ "user": "admin2",
"access_key": "1DNQ2FK80XQZJMB14W1
On 01/08/2014 04:25 AM, Blair Nilsson wrote:
nope, doesn't work...
I have an admin user... with the right caps.
{ "user_id": "admin2",
"display_name": "Admin 2admin",
"email": "",
"suspended": 0,
"max_buckets": 1000,
"auid": 0,
"subusers": [],
"keys": [
{ "user":
On 01/07/2014 12:23 PM, Wolfgang Hennerbichler wrote:
Hi,
when I designed a ceph cluster nobody talked about radosgw, it was RBD
only. Now we are thinking about adding radosgw, and I have some concern
when it comes to the number of PG's per OSD (which will grow beyond the
50-100 recommended PG's
Greetings fellow Cephalopods
We will having the first SF Bay Area meetup on 1/14 at 6PM.
There will be a couple of Tech talks, Q&A and refreshments and networking.
Please see the meetup page to RSVP and find more information
http://www.meetup.com/SF-Bay-Area-Ceph-User-group/events/158239642/
Se
On 08 Jan 2014, at 04:47, Wido den Hollander wrote:
>> I expect that basically only one pool (.rgw?) will hold the true data,
>> all other stuff (like '.users' and so on) will not be data intensive, as
>> it might only store metadata.
>>
> Indeed. So you can have less PGs for these pools. Only t
On Wed, 8 Jan 2014 10:46:42 +0900 Christian Balzer wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, 7 Jan 2014 08:35:44 -0500 Alfredo Deza wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 7:47 AM, Joao Eduardo Luis
> > wrote:
> > > On 01/07/2014 05:14 AM, Christian Balzer wrote:
> > >>
> [snip]
> > >> So I grabbed the latest
Hi Yehuda,
Thanks for response.
my setup is on ubuntu 12.04 servers, ceph pkg's:
*ii ceph 0.72.2-1precise
distributed storage and file systemii ceph-common
0.72.2-1precise common utilities to mount and interact
with a ceph storage cl
21 matches
Mail list logo
