Hi,
I have strange problem.
Obj copy (0 size) killing radosgw.
Head for this file:
Content-Type: application/octet-stream
Server: Apache/2.2.22 (Ubuntu)
ETag: "d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e-0"
Last-Modified: 2013-12-01T10:37:15Z
rgw log.
2013-12-02 08:18:59.196651 7f5308ff1700 1 == starti
Hi,
I found that issue is related with "ETag: -0" (ends -0)
This is known bug ?
--
Regards
Dominik
2013/12/2 Dominik Mostowiec :
> Hi,
> I have strange problem.
> Obj copy (0 size) killing radosgw.
>
> Head for this file:
> Content-Type: application/octet-stream
> Server: Apache/2.2.22 (Ubunt
Hi,
Sorry for the very late reply. I have been trying a lot of things...
On 25/10/13 22:40, Yan, Zheng wrote:
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 2:05 AM, Gregory Farnum wrote:
Are you sure you're using only CephFS? Do you have any snapshots?
-Greg
Software Engineer #42 @ http://inktank.com | http://ceph
Hi List,
Any chance the following will be updated with the latest packages for
dumpling/emperor:
http://ceph.com/packages/qemu-kvm/centos/x86_64/
Using CentOS 6.4 and dumpling with OpenStack Havana, I am unable to boot
from rbd volumes until I install an rbd-ified qemu-kvm. I have grabbed the
l
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 9:46 AM, Gautam Saxena wrote:
> I've got ceph up and running on a 3-node centos 6.4 cluster. However, after
> I
>
> a) set the cluster to nout as follows: ceph osd set noout
> b) rebooted 1 node
> c) logged into that 1 node, I tried to do: service ceph start osd.12
>
> but
I'm looking forward to working with everyone involved with the Ceph User
Committee
(http://wiki.ceph.com/01Planning/02Blueprints/Firefly/Ceph_User_Committee#D
etailed_Description). I believe that all of the members of the Ceph User
Committee should have received an email from Loic asking them to c
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 1:24 PM, German Anders wrote:
> Hi, i'm having issues while trying to add another monitor to my cluster:
>
> ceph@ceph-deploy01:~/ceph-cluster$ ceph-deploy mon create ceph-node02
> [ceph_deploy.cli][INFO ] Invoked (1.3.3): /usr/bin/ceph-deploy mon create
> ceph-node02
> [
Hi,
See this one also: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/6365
But I’m not sure the Inktank patched qemu-kvm is relevant any longer since
RedHat just released qemu-kvm-rhev with RBD support.
Cheers, Dan
On 02 Dec 2013, at 15:36, Darren Birkett wrote:
> Hi List,
>
> Any chance the following will b
I had not enabled discard/trim for the filesystem using the image, but I have
done so this morning. I doesn't appear to make a difference.
The extents I'm seeing reported as "zero" are not actually discarded extents.
They are extents that contain data that was added after the ending snapshot I'm
That's unknown bug. I have a guess as to how the original object was
created. Can you read the original object, but only copy fails?
On Dec 2, 2013 4:53 AM, "Dominik Mostowiec"
wrote:
> Hi,
> I found that issue is related with "ETag: -0" (ends -0)
> This is known bug ?
>
> --
> Regards
> Domi
Yes, I would recommend increasing PGs in your case.
The pg_num and pgp_num recommendations are designed to be fairly broad to
cover a wide range of different hardware that a ceph user might be
utilizing. You basically should be using a number that will ensure data
granularity across all your OSDs.
Yes I can read it. Oryginal object is 0 size.
Regards
Dominik
On Dec 2, 2013 6:14 PM, "Yehuda Sadeh" wrote:
> That's unknown bug. I have a guess as to how the original object was
> created. Can you read the original object, but only copy fails?
> On Dec 2, 2013 4:53 AM, "Dominik Mostowiec"
> w
Hi, I have a question about CEP high availability when integrated with
OpenStack.
Assuming you have all openstack controller nodes in HA mode would your actually
have an HA CEPH implementation as well meaning two Primary OSDs or both
pointing to the primary?
Or, do the client requests get for
Hi,
Another file with the same problems:
2013-12-01 11:37:15.556687 7f7891fd3700 1 == starting new request
req=0x25406d0 =
2013-12-01 11:37:15.556739 7f7891fd3700 2 req 1314:0.52initializing
2013-12-01 11:37:15.556789 7f7891fd3700 10 s->object=files/192.txt
s->bucket=testbucket
2
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 9:43 AM, Gary Harris (gharris) wrote:
> Hi, I have a question about CEP high availability when integrated with
> OpenStack.
>
>
> Assuming you have all openstack controller nodes in HA mode would your
> actually
> have an HA CEPH implementation as well meaning two Primar
Gary,
Yes, Ceph can provide a highly available infrastructure. A few pointers:
- IO will stop if anything less than a majority of the monitors are
functioning properly. So, run a minimum of 3 Ceph monitors distributed
across your data center's failure domains. If you choose to add more
monito
By any chance are you uploading empty objects through the multipart upload api?
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 12:08 PM, Dominik Mostowiec
wrote:
> Hi,
> Another file with the same problems:
>
> 2013-12-01 11:37:15.556687 7f7891fd3700 1 == starting new request
> req=0x25406d0 =
> 2013-12-01 11:3
Yes, this is probably upload empty file.
This is the problem?
--
Regards
Dominik
2013/12/2 Yehuda Sadeh :
> By any chance are you uploading empty objects through the multipart upload
> api?
>
> On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 12:08 PM, Dominik Mostowiec
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> Another file with the same pro
Hi Patrick,
Aaron and Nathan are willing to take an active role in editing
http://ceph.com/. During the Ceph Developer Summit, it was suggested that we
use ceph-users@ until it's too much noise and only then create a dedicated
mailing list. This is a friendly warning that such a noisy conversat
Looks like it. There should be a guard against it (mulitpart upload
minimum is 5M).
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 12:32 PM, Dominik Mostowiec
wrote:
> Yes, this is probably upload empty file.
> This is the problem?
>
> --
> Regards
> Dominik
>
>
> 2013/12/2 Yehuda Sadeh :
>> By any chance are you upload
Hey Loic,
That's great! As for ceph-user I was referring more to a way for
people to drop content or requests on the community at large. For a
chatty discussion about website changes we can just include the
interested parties (message to follow) and others can chime in with
their desire to help
You're right.
S3 api doc: http://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonS3/latest/API/mpUploadComplete.html
"Err:EntityTooSmall
Your proposed upload is smaller than the minimum allowed object size.
Each part must be at least 5 MB in size, except the last part."
Thanks.
This error should be triggered from rad
I have been looking at the src rpm qemu-img-0.12.1.2-2.415.el6.x86_64
It looks like it there are a number of comments implying that it supprts
rdb but
qemu -h returns.
Supported formats: raw cow qcow vdi vmdk cloop dmg bochs vpc vvfat qcow2
qed vhdx parallels nbd blkdebug host_cdrom host_flopp
You need the rhev package.
https://www.mail-archive.com/ceph-users@lists.ceph.com/msg05962.html
On Dec 2, 2013 10:18 PM, Alvin Starr wrote:
I have been looking at the src rpm qemu-img-0.12.1.2-2.415.el6.x86_64
It looks like it there are a number of comments implying that it supprts
rdb but
qemu
Actually, I read that differently. It only says that if there's more
than 1 part, all parts except for the last one need to be > 5M. Which
means that for uploads that are smaller than 5M there should be zero
or one parts.
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 12:54 PM, Dominik Mostowiec
wrote:
> You're right.
>
I'm having trouble reproducing the issue. What version are you using?
Thanks,
Yehuda
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 2:16 PM, Yehuda Sadeh wrote:
> Actually, I read that differently. It only says that if there's more
> than 1 part, all parts except for the last one need to be > 5M. Which
> means that for
Hi,
Am 02.12.2013 04:27, schrieb James Harper:
>> Hi,
>>
The low points are all ~35Mbytes/sec and the high points are all
~60Mbytes/sec. This is very reproducible.
>>>
>>> It occurred to me that just stopping the OSD's selectively would allow me to
>>> see if there was a change when one
>I don't know how rbd works inside, but i think ceph rbd here returns zeros
>without real osd disk read if the block/sector of the rbd-disk is unused. That
>would explain the graph you see. You can try adding a second rbd image and
>not format/use it and benchmark this disk, then make a filesystem
On 12/02/2013 05:06 PM, Gruher, Joseph R wrote:
I don't know how rbd works inside, but i think ceph rbd here returns zeros
without real osd disk read if the block/sector of the rbd-disk is unused. That
would explain the graph you see. You can try adding a second rbd image and
not format/use it an
Hi all,
We're looking at using Ceph's copy-on-write for a ton of users'
replicated cloud image environments,
and are wondering how efficient Ceph is for adding user data to base
images -
is data added in normal 4kB or 64kB sizes, or can you specify block size
for volumes
(so you can have video
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 9:03 PM, Miguel Afonso Oliveira
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry for the very late reply. I have been trying a lot of things...
>
>
> On 25/10/13 22:40, Yan, Zheng wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 2:05 AM, Gregory Farnum wrote:
>>>
>>> Are you sure you're using only CephFS? Do yo
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 4:39 PM, jheryl williams wrote:
> Hello ,
>
> I have been looking all over the net to find a solution to my problem and I
> came across one that you helped someone else with. I was wondering if you
> can assist me as well. I pretty much created a ceph cluster from the step b
0.56.7
On Dec 2, 2013 11:30 PM, "Yehuda Sadeh" wrote:
> I'm having trouble reproducing the issue. What version are you using?
>
> Thanks,
> Yehuda
>
> On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 2:16 PM, Yehuda Sadeh wrote:
> > Actually, I read that differently. It only says that if there's more
> > than 1 part, all
0.56.7
W dniu poniedziałek, 2 grudnia 2013 użytkownik Yehuda Sadeh napisał:
> I'm having trouble reproducing the issue. What version are you using?
>
> Thanks,
> Yehuda
>
> On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 2:16 PM, Yehuda Sadeh
> >
> wrote:
> > Actually, I read that differently. It only says that if there
I see. Do you have backtrace for the crash?
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 6:19 PM, Dominik Mostowiec
wrote:
> 0.56.7
>
> W dniu poniedziałek, 2 grudnia 2013 użytkownik Yehuda Sadeh napisał:
>
>> I'm having trouble reproducing the issue. What version are you using?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Yehuda
>>
>> On Mon, D
On 12/02/2013 08:10 AM, Stephen Taylor wrote:
I had not enabled discard/trim for the filesystem using the image, but I have
done so this morning. I doesn't appear to make a difference.
The extents I'm seeing reported as "zero" are not actually discarded extents. They are extents that
contain d
>
> I also noticed a graph like this once i benchmarked w2k8 guest on ceph with
> rbd.
> To me it looked like when the space on the drive is used, the throughput is
> lower, when the space read by rbd on the drive is unused, the reads are
> superfast.
>
> I don't know how rbd works inside, but i
for another object.
http://pastebin.com/VkVAYgwn
2013/12/3 Yehuda Sadeh :
> I see. Do you have backtrace for the crash?
>
> On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 6:19 PM, Dominik Mostowiec
> wrote:
>> 0.56.7
>>
>> W dniu poniedziałek, 2 grudnia 2013 użytkownik Yehuda Sadeh napisał:
>>
>>> I'm having trouble re
I created earlier an issue (6919) and updated it with the relevant
issue. This has been fixed in dumpling, although I don't remember
hitting the scenario that you did. Was probably hitting it as part of
the development work that was done then.
In any case I created a branch with the relevant fixes
> Is having two cluster networks like this a supported configuration? Every
osd and mon can reach every other so I think it should be.
Maybe. If your back end network is a supernet and each cluster network is a
subnet of that supernet. For example:
Ceph.conf cluster network (supernet): 10.0.0.0/8
Thanks
Workaround, don't use multipart when obj size == 0 ?
On Dec 3, 2013 6:43 AM, "Yehuda Sadeh" wrote:
> I created earlier an issue (6919) and updated it with the relevant
> issue. This has been fixed in dumpling, although I don't remember
> hitting the scenario that you did. Was probably hitt
> On 2 dec. 2013, at 18:26, "Brian Andrus" wrote:
> Setting your pg_num and pgp_num to say... 1024 would A) increase data
> granularity, B) likely lend no noticeable increase to resource consumption,
> and C) allow some room for future OSDs two be added while still within range
> of acceptab
For bobtail at this point yes. You can try the unofficial version with
that fix off the gitbuilder. Another option is to upgrade everything
to dumpling.
Yehuda
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 10:24 PM, Dominik Mostowiec
wrote:
> Thanks
> Workaround, don't use multipart when obj size == 0 ?
>
> On Dec 3,
Hi,
The first unofficial French ceph user meetup took place in Nantes on Friday
29th 2013. There were 8 participants.
Yann from the University of Nantes related his use case of ceph. During his
presentation we talked about hardware choices, about using SSD and problems
he has experienced in his
44 matches
Mail list logo