> Why wait for the data to migrate away? Normally you have replicas of the
> whole osd data, so you can simply stop the osd, reformat the disk and restart
> it again. It'll join the cluster and automatically get all data it's missing.
> Of course the risk of dataloss is a bit higher during that
|
hi,
I want to konw how to get the hash-of-header-and-secret, i read the
http://ceph.com/docs/master/radosgw/s3/authentication/ , but i still not
understand , I hope I can get example . if i want PUT a bucket for the user
{"user_id":"johndoe","rados_uid":0,"display_name":"John
Doe","emai
hello!
I've tried with wip-6078 and git dumpling builds and got the same error
during OPTIONS request.
curl -v -X OPTIONS -H 'Access-Control-Request-Method: PUT' -H "Origin:
http://X.pl"; http://static3.X.pl/
> OPTIONS / HTTP/1.1
> User-Agent: curl/7.31.0
> Host: static3.X.pl
> Accep
Thanks for your answer.
Regards
Dominik
On Aug 30, 2013 4:59 PM, "Yehuda Sadeh" wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 7:44 AM, Dominik Mostowiec
> wrote:
> > (echo -n 'GET /dysk/files/test.test%
> 40op.pl/DOMIWENT%202013/Damian%20DW/dw/Specyfikacja%20istotnych%20warunk%F3w%20zam%F3wienia.doc
> > HTT
On 09/03/2013 02:02 AM, 이주헌 wrote:
Hi all.
I have 1 MDS and 3 OSDs. I installed them via ceph-deploy. (dumpling
0.67.2 version)
At first, It works perfectly. But, after I reboot one of OSD, ceph-mon
launched on port 6800 not 6789.
This has been a recurrent issue I've been completely unable to
Time skews happen frequently when the systems running monitors are
restarted.With ntp server configured, the time skew between systems will be
fixed over some time. But the ceph monitors won't find it at once if there are
no time check messages at that time, so the ceph status will be still show
Am 03.09.2013 14:56, schrieb Joao Eduardo Luis:
On 09/03/2013 02:02 AM, 이주헌 wrote:
Hi all.
I have 1 MDS and 3 OSDs. I installed them via ceph-deploy. (dumpling
0.67.2 version)
At first, It works perfectly. But, after I reboot one of OSD, ceph-mon
launched on port 6800 not 6789.
This has been
How often are the time check messages sent between monitors?
From: dachun...@outlook.com
To: ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2013 13:22:54 +
Subject: [ceph-users] How to force a monitor time check?
Time skews happen frequently when the systems running monitors are
restarted.Wit
Hi
I have recently discovered that one of my pg is in inconsistent state. I
have checked filesystem on osd.3, and re-run deep-scrub few times. Osd uses
xfs. Any suggestions how to fix it?
# ceph -v
ceph version 0.61.8 (a6fdcca3bddbc9f177e4e2bf0d9cdd85006b028b)
# ceph pg deep-scrub 350.5e
2013-09
On Mon, 2 Sep 2013, Jens-Christian Fischer wrote:
> Hi all
> we have a Ceph Cluster with 64 OSD drives in 10 servers. We originally
> formatted the OSDs with btrfs but have had numerous problems (server kernel
> panics) that we could point back to btrfs. We are therefore in the process
> of reforma
On Sun, 1 Sep 2013, Gaylord Holder wrote:
>
> I created a pool with no replication and an RBD within that pool. I mapped
> the RBD to a machine, formatted it with a file system and dumped data on it.
>
> Just to see what kind of trouble I can get into, I stopped the OSD the RBD was
> using, mark
Awesome Sage!
I knew I had lost data. I'm trying to find out what will happen when
the worst happens (like the ceph administer is an idiot).
So those PGs are hanging around in a OSD/pool somewhere with some kind
of reference count and they just need to be recreated?
Thanks again for unstic
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 3:40 AM, Pawel Stefanski wrote:
> hello!
>
> I've tried with wip-6078 and git dumpling builds and got the same error
> during OPTIONS request.
>
> curl -v -X OPTIONS -H 'Access-Control-Request-Method: PUT' -H "Origin:
> http://X.pl"; http://static3.X.pl/
>
>> OPTIONS
On 03.09.2013, at 16:27, Sage Weil wrote:
>> ceph osd create # this should give you back the same osd number as the one
>> you just removed
>
> OSD=`ceph osd create` # may or may not be the same osd id
good point - so far it has been good to us!
>
>>
>> umount ${PART}1
>> parted $PART rm 1
We are testing radosgw with cyberduck, so far we see the following issues
1. In apache error log for each file put we see:
[Tue Sep 03 17:35:24 2013] [warn] FastCGI: 193.218.104.138 PUT
https://193.218.100.131/test/tesfile04.iso auth AWS ***
[Tue Sep 03 17:35:24 2013] [warn] FastCGI: JJJ gotCont
On 09/03/2013 02:35 PM, Da Chun Ng wrote:
How often are the time check messages sent between monitors?
The monitors will perform a timecheck every 5 minutes, by default.
You can adjust this interval using 'mon timecheck interval = SECS'.
-
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 7:20 AM, Maciej Gałkiewicz
wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have recently discovered that one of my pg is in inconsistent state. I
> have checked filesystem on osd.3, and re-run deep-scrub few times. Osd uses
> xfs. Any suggestions how to fix it?
You can use "repair" instead of "scrub" or
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 5:09 AM, Jens-Christian Fischer
wrote:
> We have a ceph cluster with 64 OSD (3 TB SATA) disks on 10 servers, and run
> an OpenStack cluster.
>
> We are planning to move the images of the running VM instances from the
> physical machines to CephFS. Our plan is to add 10 SSDs
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Fuchs, Andreas (SwissTXT)
wrote:
> We are testing radosgw with cyberduck, so far we see the following issues
>
> 1. In apache error log for each file put we see:
>
> [Tue Sep 03 17:35:24 2013] [warn] FastCGI: 193.218.104.138 PUT
> https://193.218.100.131/test/tesfi
> >
> > Now I'm trying to clear the stale PGs. I've tried removing the OSD from the
> > crush maps, the OSD lists etc, without any luck.
>
> Note that this means that you destroyed all copies of those 3 PGs, which
> means this experiment lost data.
>
> You can make ceph recreate the PGs (empty!)
Hi,
So say a usera has full control (and is the owner) of a bucket in s3 and
gives userb 'FULL_CONTROL' on the bucket. Userb writes a file and it
seems that by default the ACL for that key is going to be 'FULL_CONTROL'
for userb. When usera iterates the key even just over the ACL for the
key, th
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 2:30 PM, Derek Yarnell wrote:
> Hi,
>
> So say a usera has full control (and is the owner) of a bucket in s3 and
> gives userb 'FULL_CONTROL' on the bucket. Userb writes a file and it
> seems that by default the ACL for that key is going to be 'FULL_CONTROL'
> for userb. W
Hello Guys:
I am working with ceph nowadys and i want to use the ceph object gateway.
So, i tried to use s3 API to fulfill my needs. I use the api for create a
baucet.
PUT /{bucket} HTTP/1.1
Host: kp
x-amz-acl: public-read-write
Authorization: AWS {access-key}:{hash-of-header-and-secret}
hello!
yes, dns name is configured and working perfectly, the bucket (in this
example static3) is found actually, but RGW can't read CORS configuration
due some reason.
2013-09-04 08:07:46.082740 7ff4bf7ee700 2 req 10:0.000275:s3:OPTIONS
/::getting op
2013-09-04 08:07:46.082745 7ff4bf7ee700 2 r
24 matches
Mail list logo
