Hi!
I'm using rados Gateway with the Swift API to handle objects into Ceph. I'm
very interesting to handle metadata with the objects too. So, I can add
metadata headers with a given format (X-Container-Meta-X : Y) and get it back
again without problem. But, after this, I have several doubts abo
Hi,
On 05/28/2013 10:03 AM, Alvaro Izquierdo Jimeno wrote:
Hi!
I’m using rados Gateway with the Swift API to handle objects into Ceph.
I’m very interesting to handle metadata with the objects too. So, I can
add metadata headers with a given format (X-Container-Meta-X : Y) and
get it back again
On 05/24/2013 06:22 PM, Tim Bishop wrote:
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 05:10:14PM +0200, Wido den Hollander wrote:
On 05/23/2013 11:34 PM, Tim Bishop wrote:
I'm evaluating Ceph and one of my workloads is a server that provides
home directories to end users over both NFS and Samba. I'm looking at
whe
Hi all,
I'm trying to debug a problem with packet signing between radosgw and
keystone.
I have followed the procedure available here
http://ceph.com/docs/master/radosgw/config/#integrating-with-openstack-keyst
one, but the following problem appears in the logs:
2013-05-28 11:24:07.16990
Hi Stuart,
I'm also fiddling with radosgw and keystone and i am not an expert in any
way but i will try to help the best I can.
>From what I gathered from your logs apache and thus the radosgw are
accessible via the URL "http://bnedevcm.vrt.int/swift/v1";, and your keystone
server at "http://bned
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 1:12 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On 05/28/2013 10:03 AM, Alvaro Izquierdo Jimeno wrote:
>>
>> Hi!
>>
>> I’m using rados Gateway with the Swift API to handle objects into Ceph.
>> I’m very interesting to handle metadata with the objects too. So, I can
>> add me
It might be that it's missing another certificate (for the CA). Under
/etc/keystone/ssl there are a bunch of other certificates, maybe the
instructions are missing one of these.
Yehuda
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 2:40 AM, Davide Fanciola wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> I’m trying to debug a problem with pa
Hi Yehuda,
I finally managed to make it work :)
The certificates were correct but the trust options for the "signing_cert"
were not.
The command I used to convert the signing_cert is the following :
# openssl x509 -in /etc/keystone/ssl/certs/signing_cert.pem -pubkey |
certutil -A -d /v
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 8:25 AM, Davide Fanciola wrote:
> Hi Yehuda,
>
> I finally managed to make it work :)
Awesome!
>
> The certificates were correct but the trust options for the "signing_cert"
> were not.
> The command I used to convert the signing_cert is the following :
>
> # openssl x509
Hey,
I'll check see if I can get it going right now. Thanks for taking the time
to help out
Daniel
On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 7:01 PM, John Wilkins wrote:
> Daniel,
>
> I finished up the procedure this morning and put it up on the web. It
> seems to be working fine for me.
>
> On Fri, May 24, 201
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 2:43 PM, Giuseppe 'Gippa' Paterno'
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I've got a cluster of two nodes on Ubuntu 12.04 with cuttlefish from the
> ceph.com repo.
> ceph version 0.61.2 (fea782543a844bb277ae94d3391788b76c5bee60)
>
> The MDS process is dying after a while with a stack trace, but
Wolfgang,
On 28 May 2013, at 06:50, Wolfgang Hennerbichler wrote:
> for anybody who's interested, I've packaged the latest qemu-1.4.2 (not 1.5,
> it didn't work nicely with libvirt) which includes important fixes to RBD for
> ubuntu 12.04 AMD64. If you want to save some time, I can share the pa
Joao,
I made sure there wasn't any other ceph-mon running, and now when I run it
I see this:
# ceph-mon -d -c /etc/ceph/ceph.conf
2013-05-28 13:46:47.060426 7fbc68a80780 0 ceph version 0.61.2
(fea782543a844bb277ae94d3391788b76c5bee60), process ceph-mon, pid 9640
2013-05-28 13:46:47.196659 7fbc68
Hi Greg,
> Do I correctly assume that you don't have any CephFS data in the cluster yet?
The funny thing this was a fresh installation.
Just for your information, ceph-deploy didn't worked for me and I had to
do all the operations manually.
I recreated one of the two ceph clusters with bobtail, sam
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 2:35 PM, Giuseppe 'Gippa' Paterno'
wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>> Do I correctly assume that you don't have any CephFS data in the cluster yet?
> The funny thing this was a fresh installation.
> Just for your information, ceph-deploy didn't worked for me and I had to
> do all the ope
Wolgang,I'm interested, and I assume I'm not the only one, thus can't you just make it public for everyone?Thanks.Sébastien HanCloud Engineer"Always give 100%. Unless you're giving blood."Phone : +33 (0)1 49 70 99 72 – Mobile : +33 (0)6 52 84 44 70Email : sebastien@enovance.com – Skype : ha
Arf sorry Wolfgang I scratched your name in my previous email :).Sébastien HanCloud Engineer"Always give 100%. Unless you're giving blood."Phone : +33 (0)1 49 70 99 72 – Mobile : +33 (0)6 52 84 44 70Email : sebastien@enovance.com – Skype : han.sbastienAddress : 10, rue de la Victoire – 7500
Hmmit looks like maybe my issue is bigger than just the swift
secret_key not showing up. I started using the other key that's provided
under "keys" in the user map just to see if it works but I get 500's back.
In my apache error log I get
[Tue May 28 15:19:59 2013] [notice] Apache/2.2.22 (Ubun
Can you paste your ceph.conf file, rgw.conf file, s3gw.fcgi file and
your log file?
I'm trying to work out a reliable procedure for the S3 subdomain, and
ran into a a few issues.
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Daniel Curran wrote:
> Hmmit looks like maybe my issue is bigger than just the s
Seb, yeah, it would be nice to have the debs. Is there a ppa that we could all use?ThanksAndreiFrom: "Sebastien Han" To: "Alex Bligh" Cc: ceph-users@lists.ceph.comSent: Tuesday, 28 May, 2013 11:21:28 PMSubject: Re: [ceph-users] qemu-1.4.2 rbd-fixed ubuntu packagesArf sorry Wolfgang I scratched your
Hello,
I would like to mount a single RBD on multiple hosts to be able to share
the block device.
Is this possible? I understand that it's not possible to share data
between the different interfaces, e.g. CephFS and RBDs, but I don't see
anywhere it's declared that sharing an RBD between hosts is
Another sprint, and v0.63 is here. This release features librbd
improvements, mon fixes, osd robustness, and packaging fixes.
Notable features in this release include:
* librbd: parallelize delete, rollback, flatten, copy, resize
* librbd: ability to read from local replicas
* osd: resurrect
Hi Majodomo
I am TuanTB (full name: Tuan Ta Ba, and I come from VietNam),
I 'm working about the Cloud Computing
Of course, Were are using the Ceph, and I'm a new Ceph'member
so, I hope to be joined "ceph-delvel", "ceph-users" mailist.
Thank you so much
Regrex!
--TuanTB
__
Sorry, too lazy for a ppa. But 4 files you can download and install with
dpkg -i:
http://www.wogri.at/Qemu-Ceph-Packages.343.0.html
Wolfgang
On 05/29/2013 02:49 AM, Andrei Mikhailovsky wrote:
> Seb, yeah, it would be nice to have the debs. Is there a ppa that we
> could all use?
>
> Thanks
>
>
Hi Jon, I already mentioned multiple times here - RBD just a block device.
You can map it to multiple hosts, but before doing dd if=/dev/zero
of=/media/tmp/test you have created file system, right? This file system
MUST be distributed, thus multiple hosts can read and write files on it.
On Wed,
25 matches
Mail list logo
