On 2013-03-26 17:07, Romeo M wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Anyone have any ideas on this? It's driving us nuts!
Sharing your current configuration might help. Is the radosgw on an
extra host or together with some other Ceph daemon?
Regards,
Andreas
>
> Thanks!
>
> Rom
>
>
>
Well, after few tests, i can't increase size of journal. I think size of
journal set only when osd create. So for change journal size u need to
delete osd and create with new journal.
2013/3/26 Chen, Xiaoxi
> Are you using a partition as journal?
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* ceph-users-boun...@l
On 03/25/2013 06:03 AM, Dan van der Ster wrote:
> Hi,
> Apologies if this is already a known bug (though I didn't find it).
>
> If we try to map a device that doesn't exist, we get an immediate and
> reproduceable kernel BUG (see the P.S.). We hit this by accident
> because we forgot to add the --
Sébastien Han actually covers this on his blog:
http://www.sebastien-han.fr/blog/2012/08/17/ceph-storage-node-maintenance/
His use case is moving from an embedded journal to one on an SSD but the steps
can be used to move/recreate the journal for any reason:
Mark the OSD "out"
Stop the OSD daemo
On Wed, 27 Mar 2013, Aleksey Samarin wrote:
> Well, after few tests, i can't increase size of journal. I think size of
> journal set only when osd create. So for change journal size u need to
> delete osd and create with new journal.
ceph-osd --flush-journal
(delete journal file)
ceph-osd --mkjour
Yeah!
Thanks all for your replies!
2013/3/27 Sage Weil
> On Wed, 27 Mar 2013, Aleksey Samarin wrote:
> > Well, after few tests, i can't increase size of journal. I think size of
> > journal set only when osd create. So for change journal size u need to
> > delete osd and create with new journal.
This should actually be "down", not "out". Out will trigger a data migration. :)
-Greg
Software Engineer #42 @ http://inktank.com | http://ceph.com
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 8:36 AM, John Nielsen wrote:
> Sébastien Han actually covers this on his blog:
>
> http://www.sebastien-han.fr/blog/2012/08
Indeed, thanks! Sébastien, care to update your helpful blog post?
On Mar 27, 2013, at 10:04 AM, Gregory Farnum wrote:
> This should actually be "down", not "out". Out will trigger a data migration.
> :)
> -Greg
>
> Software Engineer #42 @ http://inktank.com | http://ceph.com
>
>
> On Wed, Ma
Yes I will :-), thank you for pointing out this to me.Sébastien HanCloud Engineer"Always give 100%. Unless you're giving blood."PHONE : +33 (0)1 49 70 99 72 – MOBILE : +33 (0)6 52 84 44 70EMAIL : sebastien@enovance.com – SKYPE : han.sbastienADDRESS : 10, rue de la Victoire – 75009 ParisWEB
I just edited the post, I opted for the 'noout' option at the end. It's the one that makes the most sense to me.Sébastien HanCloud Engineer"Always give 100%. Unless you're giving blood."PHONE : +33 (0)1 49 70 99 72 – MOBILE : +33 (0)6 52 84 44 70EMAIL : sebastien@enovance.com – SKYPE : han.
Hi list,
I'm trying to create a active/active Samba cluster on top of Cephfs
I would ask if Ceph fully supports CTDB at this time.
I've found some (maybe outdated) documentation on the net in witch the
Ceph support is still marked with a question mark or with a "soon..." note
Thank you
--
Marco
Ok,I just noticed that the documentation seems to be wrong, the correct command to find the location of an object is:$ ceph odd map Then, the error that you raised is pretty strange because even the object doesn't exist, the command will calculate the eventual location.Could you please paste _all_
Arf sorry, not 'odd' but 'osd' of course. (thanks autocompletion…)Sébastien HanCloud Engineer"Always give 100%. Unless you're giving blood."PHONE : +33 (0)1 49 70 99 72 – MOBILE : +33 (0)6 52 84 44 70EMAIL : sebastien@enovance.com – SKYPE : han.sbastienADDRESS : 10, rue de la Victoire – 750
Sebastian,
You're correct. The usage has changed, so I've updated the doc to reflect
it. I ran through the procedure and it worked fine for me. Sorry Waed. I
hope that's all that was wrong.
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Sebastien Han
wrote:
> Arf sorry, not 'odd' but 'osd' of course. (thanks
We need a bit more information. If you can do: "ceph osd dump", "ceph
osd tree", and paste your ceph conf, we might get a bit further. The
CRUSH hierarchy looks okay. I can't see the replica size from this
though.
Have you followed this procedure to see if your object is getting
remapped?
http://
Hi John,Could you also please update the generic usage at the beginning of the section?Thanks!ps: I tried to push a change, but something went wrong with Github...Sébastien HanCloud Engineer"Always give 100%. Unless you're giving blood."PHONE : +33 (0)1 49 70 99 72 – MOBILE : +33 (0)6 52 84 44
Already done. Missed it at first. Thanks! :)
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 5:17 PM, Sebastien Han
wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> Could you also please update the generic usage at the beginning of the
> section?
>
> Thanks!
>
> ps: I tried to push a change, but something went wrong with Github...
>
>
> Séba
Hi,
that's the config http://pastebin.com/2JzABSYt
ceph osd dump http://pastebin.com/GSCGKL1k
ceph osd tree http://pastebin.com/VSgPFRYv
As far as I can tell they are not mapped right.
sdmap e133 pool 'rbd' (2) object '2.31a' -> pg 2.f3caaf00 (2.300) -> up
[13,23] acting [13,23]
-martin
On 28.
Hi,
today one of my mons crashed, the log is here.
http://pastebin.com/ugr1fMJR
I think the most important part is:
2013-03-28 01:57:48.564647 7fac6c0ea700 -1
auth/none/AuthNoneServiceHandler.h: In function 'virtual int
AuthNoneServiceHandler::handle_request(ceph::buffer::list::iterator&,
ceph::b
So the OSD you shutdown is down and in. How long does it stay in the
degraded state? In the docs here,
http://ceph.com/docs/master/rados/operations/monitoring-osd-pg/ , we
discuss the notion that a down OSD is not technically out of the
cluster for awhile. I believe the default value is 300 seconds
Martin,
A crash is usually a bug. You should report this to the ceph-devel list.
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 6:03 PM, Martin Mailand wrote:
> Hi,
>
> today one of my mons crashed, the log is here.
> http://pastebin.com/ugr1fMJR
>
> I think the most important part is:
> 2013-03-28 01:57:48.564647 7fa
Hi John,
if I shut down a osd, the cluster stays in degraded status for hours and
there is no recovery traffic at all.
-martin
On 28.03.2013 02:25, John Wilkins wrote:
> So the OSD you shutdown is down and in. How long does it stay in the
> degraded state? In the docs here,
> http://ceph.com/do
Hi John,
I still think this part in the crushmap is wrong.
step take default
step choose firstn 0 type rack
step chooseleaf firstn 0 type host
step emit
I first take from the defaut -> that's okay,
Now I take two from the rack -> that's still ok
But now, I will ta
Hi Andreas,
We're running it on a storage node (it's running 4 OSD processes, but no mon
processes). Here's the config:
Thanks!
Rom
[global]
auth supported = cephx
auth cluster required = cephx
auth service required = cephx
auth client required = cephx
[osd]
Okay, John Wilkins suggested turning off authentication to see if that works...
and it seems to have!
We commented our the three "required" auth lines in global, and radosgw started
right up.
However, we don't really want to run without auth, so anyone have any ideas
what the issue could be w
On 03/27/2013 10:41 AM, Marco Aroldi wrote:
Hi list,
I'm trying to create a active/active Samba cluster on top of Cephfs
I would ask if Ceph fully supports CTDB at this time.
If I'm not wrong Ceph (even CephFS) do not support exporting a block
device or mounting the same FS more than once wherea
26 matches
Mail list logo
