Re: [ceph-users] v0.66 released

2013-07-19 Thread Sage Weil
On Fri, 19 Jul 2013, Erik Logtenberg wrote: > > * osd: pg log (re)writes are not vastly more efficient (faster peering) > >(Sam Just) > > Do you really mean "are not"? I'd think "are now" would make sense (?) Yeah, "are now"... this got fixed in the blog post but I didn't send out another

Re: [ceph-users] v0.66 released

2013-07-19 Thread Erik Logtenberg
> * osd: pg log (re)writes are not vastly more efficient (faster peering) >(Sam Just) Do you really mean "are not"? I'd think "are now" would make sense (?) - Erik. ___ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/list

Re: [ceph-users] v0.66 released

2013-07-10 Thread Sage Weil
On Wed, 10 Jul 2013, David McBride wrote: > On 09/07/13 19:32, Sage Weil wrote: > > > * mds: support robust lookup by ino number (good for NFS) (Yan, Zheng) > > Hello Sage, > > I recall that lookups-by-inode could historically return -ESTALE if the > inode in question was no-longer in the MDS c

Re: [ceph-users] v0.66 released

2013-07-10 Thread David McBride
On 09/07/13 19:32, Sage Weil wrote: > * mds: support robust lookup by ino number (good for NFS) (Yan, Zheng) Hello Sage, I recall that lookups-by-inode could historically return -ESTALE if the inode in question was no-longer in the MDS cache. This presumably removes that deficiency? Is there