Re: [ceph-users] feature set mismatch after upgrade from Emperor to Firefly

2014-07-20 Thread Andrei Mikhailovsky
t;Irek Fasikhov" Cc: "Andrei Mikhailovsky" , ceph-users@lists.ceph.com Sent: Sunday, 20 July, 2014 7:55:49 PM Subject: Re: [ceph-users] feature set mismatch after upgrade from Emperor to Firefly On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 10:29 PM, Irek Fasikhov wrote: > Привет, Андрей. >

Re: [ceph-users] feature set mismatch after upgrade from Emperor to Firefly

2014-07-20 Thread Ilya Dryomov
On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 10:29 PM, Irek Fasikhov wrote: > Привет, Андрей. > > ceph osd getcrushmap -o /tmp/crush > crushtool -i /tmp/crush --set-chooseleaf_vary_r 0 -o /tmp/crush.new > ceph osd setcrushmap -i /tmp/crush.new > > Or > > update kernel 3.15. > > > 2014-07-20 20:19 GMT+04:00 Andrei Mikh

Re: [ceph-users] feature set mismatch after upgrade from Emperor to Firefly

2014-07-20 Thread Irek Fasikhov
Привет, Андрей. ceph osd getcrushmap -o /tmp/crush crushtool -i /tmp/crush --set-chooseleaf_vary_r 0 -o /tmp/crush.new ceph osd setcrushmap -i /tmp/crush.new Or update kernel 3.15. 2014-07-20 20:19 GMT+04:00 Andrei Mikhailovsky : > Hello guys, > > > I have noticed the following message/error

Re: [ceph-users] feature set mismatch,

2014-06-06 Thread Bryan Wright
Ilya Dryomov writes: > Unless you have been playing with 'osd primary-affinity' command, the > problem is probably that you have chooseleaf_vary_r tunable set in your > crushmap. This is a new tunable, it will be supported in 3.15. If you > disable it with > > ceph osd getcrushmap -o /tmp/crus

Re: [ceph-users] feature set mismatch, "missing 20000000000"

2014-06-06 Thread Ilya Dryomov
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Bryan Wright wrote: > Hi folks, > > Thanks to Sage Weil's advice, I fixed my "TMAP2OMAP" problem by just > restarting the osds, but now I'm running into the following cephfs problem. > When I try to mount the filesystem, I get errors like the following: > >

Re: [ceph-users] feature set mismatch

2014-01-30 Thread Sage Weil
Hi Markus, You need to remove the erasure rule from the CRUSH map that was erroneously put in the default map for this version. The command you need is ceph osd crush rule rm you can list rules with ceph osd crush rule ls and the one you want to remove is named 'erasure-default' or some

Re: [ceph-users] feature set mismatch

2014-01-30 Thread Markus Goldberg
Hello Ilya, thank you for your help. I first tried 'ceph osd crush tunables legacy' on each server with rebooting. That didn't help anything. I though, that running this command the feature should be disabled, but the error remains. In the past i only did rolling ceph-upgrades with 'apt-get up

Re: [ceph-users] feature set mismatch

2014-01-29 Thread Ilya Dryomov
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 1:58 PM, Markus Goldberg wrote: > Hi, > i can't mount.ceph: > mount.ceph bd-0:/ /mnt/myceph -v -o > name=admin,secretfile=/etc/ceph/admin.secret > parsing options: name=admin,secretfile=/etc/ceph/admin.secret > mount error 5 = Input/output error > > ceph -s is OK, > > When

Re: [ceph-users] feature set mismatch

2013-07-19 Thread Gaylord Holder
On 07/17/2013 05:49 PM, Josh Durgin wrote: [please keep replies on the list] On 07/17/2013 04:04 AM, Gaylord Holder wrote: On 07/16/2013 09:22 PM, Josh Durgin wrote: On 07/16/2013 06:06 PM, Gaylord Holder wrote: Now whenever I try to map an RBD to a machine, mon0 complains: feature set m

Re: [ceph-users] feature set mismatch

2013-07-17 Thread Josh Durgin
[please keep replies on the list] On 07/17/2013 04:04 AM, Gaylord Holder wrote: On 07/16/2013 09:22 PM, Josh Durgin wrote: On 07/16/2013 06:06 PM, Gaylord Holder wrote: Now whenever I try to map an RBD to a machine, mon0 complains: feature set mismatch, my 2 < server's 2040002, missing 2040

Re: [ceph-users] feature set mismatch

2013-07-16 Thread Sage Weil
On Tue, 16 Jul 2013, Gaylord Holder wrote: > I had RBD's working and mapping working. Then I grew the cluster and > increased the OSDs. > > Now whenever I try to map an RBD to a machine, mon0 complains: > > feature set mismatch, my 2 < server's 2040002, missing 204 > missing required protoco

Re: [ceph-users] feature set mismatch

2013-07-16 Thread Josh Durgin
On 07/16/2013 06:06 PM, Gaylord Holder wrote: Now whenever I try to map an RBD to a machine, mon0 complains: feature set mismatch, my 2 < server's 2040002, missing 204 missing required protocol features. Your cluster is using newer crush tunables to get better data distribution, but your k