t;
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: ceph-users [mailto:ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com] On Behalf
> > Of Adrian Saul
> > Sent: Thursday, 22 September 2016 7:15 PM
> > To: n...@fisk.me.uk <mailto:n...@fisk.me.uk> ; ceph-users@lists.ce
heers,
> Adrian
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: ceph-users [mailto:ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com] On Behalf
> > Of Adrian Saul
> > Sent: Thursday, 22 September 2016 7:15 PM
> > To: n...@fisk.me.uk; ceph-users@lists.
at the service times would
> blow out that much.
>
> Cheers,
> Adrian
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: ceph-users [mailto:ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com] On Behalf
> > Of Adrian Saul
> > Sent: Thursday, 22 September
much.
Cheers,
Adrian
> -Original Message-
> From: ceph-users [mailto:ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com] On Behalf Of
> Adrian Saul
> Sent: Thursday, 22 September 2016 7:15 PM
> To: n...@fisk.me.uk; ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Snap delete
Of Adrian Saul
> > Sent: 22 September 2016 05:19
> > To: 'ceph-users@lists.ceph.com'
> > Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Snap delete performance impact
> >
> >
> > Any guidance on this? I have osd_snap_trim_sleep set to 1 and it
> > seems to have tem
owly would be a good addition. Have you tried that value set to higher
than 1, maybe 10?
Nick
> -Original Message-
> From: ceph-users [mailto:ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com] On Behalf Of
> Adrian Saul
> Sent: 22 September 2016 05:19
> To: 'ceph-users@lists.ceph.com&#
Any guidance on this? I have osd_snap_trim_sleep set to 1 and it seems to have
tempered some of the issues but its still bad enough that NFS storage off RBD
volumes become unavailable for over 3 minutes.
It seems that the activity which the snapshot deletes are actioned triggers
massive disk
