Thanks for the hint, I will update my code.
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason Dillaman [mailto:jdill...@redhat.com]
> Sent: 06 September 2016 14:44
> To: Nick Fisk
> Cc: ceph-users
> Subject: Re: [ceph-users] RBD Watch Notify for snapshots
>
> If you re
watch is still active?
>
> Thanks,
> Nick
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Jason Dillaman [mailto:jdill...@redhat.com]
>> Sent: 24 August 2016 15:54
>> To: Nick Fisk
>> Cc: ceph-users
>> Subject: Re: [ceph-users] RBD Watch Notify for snapshots
>>
>
atch_check function, do I need to call this
periodically to check that the watch is still active?
Thanks,
Nick
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason Dillaman [mailto:jdill...@redhat.com]
> Sent: 24 August 2016 15:54
> To: Nick Fisk
> Cc: ceph-users
> Subject: Re: [ceph-users] RB
sk wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Jason Dillaman [mailto:jdill...@redhat.com]
>> Sent: 23 August 2016 13:23
>> To: Nick Fisk
>> Cc: ceph-users
>> Subject: Re: [ceph-users] RBD Watch Notify for snapshots
>>
>> Looks good. Since you are re-u
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason Dillaman [mailto:jdill...@redhat.com]
> Sent: 23 August 2016 13:23
> To: Nick Fisk
> Cc: ceph-users
> Subject: Re: [ceph-users] RBD Watch Notify for snapshots
>
> Looks good. Since you are re-using the RBD header
ve described, as it would be a much neater solution.
>>
>> Nick
>>
>> > -Original Message-
>> > From: ceph-users [mailto:ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com] On Behalf
>> > Of Jason Dillaman
>> > Sent: 08 July 2016 04:02
>> > To: n...
> -Original Message-
> From: Ilya Dryomov [mailto:idryo...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 22 August 2016 15:00
> To: Jason Dillaman
> Cc: Nick Fisk ; ceph-users
> Subject: Re: [ceph-users] RBD Watch Notify for snapshots
>
> On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 5:02 AM, Jason Dillaman
> -Original Message-
> From: Ilya Dryomov [mailto:idryo...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 22 August 2016 14:53
> To: Nick Fisk
> Cc: Jason Dillaman ; ceph-users
>
> Subject: Re: [ceph-users] RBD Watch Notify for snapshots
>
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 3:13 PM, Nic
On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 5:02 AM, Jason Dillaman wrote:
> librbd pseudo-automatically handles this by flushing the cache to the
> snapshot when a new snapshot is created, but I don't think krbd does the
> same. If it doesn't, it would probably be a nice addition to the block
> driver to support the
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 3:13 PM, Nick Fisk wrote:
> Hi Jason,
>
> Here is my initial attempt at using the Watch/Notify support to be able to
> remotely fsfreeze a filesystem on a RBD. Please note this
> was all very new to me and so there will probably be a lot of things that
> haven't been done
ink.
Nick
> -Original Message-
> From: ceph-users [mailto:ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com] On Behalf Of Nick
> Fisk
> Sent: 08 July 2016 09:58
> To: dilla...@redhat.com
> Cc: 'ceph-users'
> Subject: Re: [ceph-users] RBD Watch Notify for snapshots
>
> Thank
users
> Subject: Re: [ceph-users] RBD Watch Notify for snapshots
>
> librbd pseudo-automatically handles this by flushing the cache to the
> snapshot when a new snapshot is created, but I don't think krbd
> does the same. If it doesn't, it would probably be a nice a
librbd pseudo-automatically handles this by flushing the cache to the
snapshot when a new snapshot is created, but I don't think krbd does the
same. If it doesn't, it would probably be a nice addition to the block
driver to support the general case.
Baring that (or if you want to involve something
13 matches
Mail list logo
