> I'm sorry, but I did not understand you :)
Sorry (-: My finger touched the RETURN-key to fast...
Try to setup a bigger value for the read ahead cache, maybe 256 MB?
echo "262144">/sys/block/vda/queue/read_ahead_kb
Try also "fio" performance tool - it will show more detailed information.
-boun...@lists.ceph.com] *On Behalf Of * ???
> *Sent:* Friday, February 07, 2014 10:55 AM
> *To:* Konrad Gutkowski
> *Cc:* ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> *Subject:* Re: [ceph-users] RBD+KVM problems with sequential read
>
>
>
> echo "noop">/sys/block/vda/queue/scheduler
>
: [ceph-users] RBD+KVM problems with sequential read
echo "noop">/sys/block/vda/queue/scheduler
echo "1000" >/sys/block/vda/queue/nr_requests
echo "8192">/sys/block/vda/queue/read_ahead_kb
[root@nfs tmp]# dd if=test of=/dev/null
39062500+0 records in
39062500
echo "noop">/sys/block/vda/queue/scheduler
echo "1000" >/sys/block/vda/queue/nr_requests
echo "8192">/sys/block/vda/queue/read_ahead_kb
[root@nfs tmp]# dd if=test of=/dev/null
39062500+0 records in
39062500+0 records out
200 bytes (20 GB) copied, 244.024 s, 82.0 MB/s
Changing these param
Hi,W dniu 07.02.2014 o 08:14 Ирек Фасихов pisze:[...]Why might such a low speed sequential read? Do ideas on this issue?
Iirc you need to set your readahead for the device higher (inside the vm) to compensate for network rtt.blockdev --setra x /dev/vdaThanks.-- С уважением, Фасихов Ирек Нургаязов
