roll
>back???
From: Steve Taylor [mailto:steve.tay...@storagecraft.com]
Sent: 30 March 2017 20:07
To: n...@fisk.me.uk; ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Question about unfound objects
One other thing to note with this experience is that we do a LOT of RBD snap
trimming, l
One other thing to note with this experience is that we do a LOT of RBD snap
trimming, like hundreds of millions of objects per day added to our snap_trimqs
globally. All of the unfound objects in these cases were found on other OSDs in
the cluster with identical contents, but associated with di
Good suggestion, Nick. I actually did that at the time. The "ceph osd map"
wasn't all that interesting because the OSDs had been outed and their PGs had
been mapped to new OSDs. Everything appeared to be in order with the PGs being
mapped to the right number of new OSDs. The PG mappings looked f
Hi Steve,
If you can recreate or if you can remember the object name, it might be worth
trying to run "ceph osd map" on the objects and see
where it thinks they map to. And/or maybe pg query might show something?
Nick
From: ceph-users [mailto:ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com] On Behal