Re: [ceph-users] Posix AIO vs libaio read performance

2017-03-30 Thread Xavier Trilla
. Thanks! Xavi. De: Michal Kozanecki [mailto:michal.kozane...@live.ca] Enviado el: sábado, 11 de marzo de 2017 1:36 Para: dilla...@redhat.com; Xavier Trilla CC: ceph-users Asunto: Re: [ceph-users] Posix AIO vs libaio read performance Hi Xavier, Are you sure this is due to CEPH? I get similar

Re: [ceph-users] Posix AIO vs libaio read performance

2017-03-30 Thread Xavier Trilla
De: Jason Dillaman [mailto:jdill...@redhat.com] Enviado el: viernes, 10 de marzo de 2017 19:18 Para: Xavier Trilla CC: Alexandre DERUMIER ; ceph-users Asunto: Re: [ceph-users] Posix AIO vs libaio read performance librbd doesn't know that you are using libaio vs POSIX AIO. Therefore, the b

Re: [ceph-users] Posix AIO vs libaio read performance

2017-03-30 Thread Xavier Trilla
-- De: Alexandre DERUMIER [mailto:aderum...@odiso.com] Enviado el: sábado, 11 de marzo de 2017 7:25 Para: Xavier Trilla CC: ceph-users Asunto: Re: [ceph-users] Posix AIO vs libaio read performance >>Regarding rbd cache, is something I will try -today I was thinking about it- >>but

Re: [ceph-users] Posix AIO vs libaio read performance

2017-03-10 Thread Alexandre DERUMIER
se of aio=threads with cache=writeback is enable, but can use aio=native with cache=none. - Mail original - De: "Xavier Trilla" À: "aderumier" Cc: "ceph-users" Envoyé: Vendredi 10 Mars 2017 14:12:59 Objet: Re: [ceph-users] Posix AIO vs libaio read performa

Re: [ceph-users] Posix AIO vs libaio read performance

2017-03-10 Thread Xavier Trilla
gt; OSDs. > But so far performance of the OSDs is really good using other test > engines, so I’m working more on the client side. > > > > Any help or information would be really welcome J > > > > Thanks. > > Xavier. > > > > De: ceph-users [mailto:ce

Re: [ceph-users] Posix AIO vs libaio read performance

2017-03-10 Thread Jason Dillaman
or information would be really welcome J > > > > Thanks. > > Xavier. > > > > De: ceph-users [mailto:ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com] En nombre de > Xavier Trilla > Enviado el: viernes, 10 de marzo de 2017 14:13 > Para: Alexandre DERUMIER > CC: ceph-user

Re: [ceph-users] Posix AIO vs libaio read performance

2017-03-10 Thread Xavier Trilla
rilla Enviado el: viernes, 10 de marzo de 2017 14:13 Para: Alexandre DERUMIER CC: ceph-users Asunto: Re: [ceph-users] Posix AIO vs libaio read performance Hi Alexandre, Debugging is disabled in client and osds. Regarding rbd cache, is something I will try -today I was thinking about it- but I d

Re: [ceph-users] Posix AIO vs libaio read performance

2017-03-10 Thread Xavier Trilla
ing iothread on qemu drive should help a little bit too. - Mail original - De: "Xavier Trilla" mailto:xavier.tri...@silicontower.net>> À: "ceph-users" mailto:ceph-users@lists.ceph.com>> Envoyé: Vendredi 10 Mars 2017 05:37:01 Objet: Re: [ceph-users] Posix AIO vs l

Re: [ceph-users] Posix AIO vs libaio read performance

2017-03-09 Thread Alexandre DERUMIER
05:37:01 Objet: Re: [ceph-users] Posix AIO vs libaio read performance Hi, We compiled Hammer .10 to use jemalloc and now the cluster performance improved a lot, but POSIX AIO operations are still quite slower than libaio. Now with a single thread read operations are about 1000 per second

Re: [ceph-users] Posix AIO vs libaio read performance

2017-03-09 Thread Xavier Trilla
Hi, We compiled Hammer .10 to use jemalloc and now the cluster performance improved a lot, but POSIX AIO operations are still quite slower than libaio. Now with a single thread read operations are about 1000 per second and write operations about 5000 per second. Using same FIO configuration,