Re: [ceph-users] Old vs New pool on same OSDs - Performance Difference

2015-06-30 Thread Nick Fisk
oy' > Cc: ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Old vs New pool on same OSDs - Performance > Difference > > > -Original Message- > > From: Somnath Roy [mailto:somnath@sandisk.com] > > Sent: 29 June 2015 23:29 > > To: Nick Fisk &

Re: [ceph-users] Old vs New pool on same OSDs - Performance Difference

2015-06-30 Thread Nick Fisk
> -Original Message- > From: Somnath Roy [mailto:somnath@sandisk.com] > Sent: 29 June 2015 23:29 > To: Nick Fisk > Cc: ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > Subject: RE: [ceph-users] Old vs New pool on same OSDs - Performance > Difference > > Nick, > I think you

Re: [ceph-users] Old vs New pool on same OSDs - Performance Difference

2015-06-29 Thread Somnath Roy
] Sent: Monday, June 29, 2015 3:05 PM To: Somnath Roy Cc: ceph-users@lists.ceph.com Subject: RE: [ceph-users] Old vs New pool on same OSDs - Performance Difference Sorry, forgot to enable that. Here is another capture with it on and I think you are spot on as I can see a 100ms delay doing the g

Re: [ceph-users] Old vs New pool on same OSDs - Performance Difference

2015-06-29 Thread Nick Fisk
349 pg[0.128( v 26335'8141858 (26331'8138777,26335'8141858] local-les=26276 n=5243 ec=1 les/c 26276/26305 26264/26272/26272) [1,21,31] r=0 lpr=26272 crt=26335'8141855 lcod 26335'8141857 mlcod 26335'8141857 active+clean] publish_stats_to_osd 26349:8019961 2015-06-29 22:

Re: [ceph-users] Old vs New pool on same OSDs - Performance Difference

2015-06-29 Thread Somnath Roy
7;_snapset'... Thanks & Regards Somnath -Original Message- From: Nick Fisk [mailto:n...@fisk.me.uk] Sent: Monday, June 29, 2015 4:54 AM To: Somnath Roy Cc: ceph-users@lists.ceph.com Subject: RE: [ceph-users] Old vs New pool on same OSDs - Performance Difference Hi Somnath, Sorry for the

Re: [ceph-users] Old vs New pool on same OSDs - Performance Difference

2015-06-29 Thread Nick Fisk
335'1369662] local-les=26276 n=5050 ec=1 les/c 26276/26311 26264/26270/26270) [1,23,11] r=0 lpr=26270 crt=26335'1369659 lcod 26335'1369661 mlcod 26335'1369661 active+clean] log_op_stats osd_op(client.2808923.0:188 rb.0.1ba70.238e1f29.264a [read 720896~65536] 0.52c3

Re: [ceph-users] Old vs New pool on same OSDs - Performance Difference

2015-06-20 Thread Somnath Roy
sts.ceph.com > Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Old vs New pool on same OSDs - Performance > Difference > > Nick, > I think the only IO operation between 'reached_pg' and 'started' is > fetching the xttrs. Check the following. > > 1. Enable debug log 20 (

Re: [ceph-users] Old vs New pool on same OSDs - Performance Difference

2015-06-20 Thread Nick Fisk
this helps, > > Thanks & Regards > Somnath > > -Original Message- > From: Nick Fisk [mailto:n...@fisk.me.uk] > Sent: Saturday, June 20, 2015 8:10 AM > To: Somnath Roy > Cc: ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > Subject: RE: [ceph-users] Old vs New pool on same OSDs

Re: [ceph-users] Old vs New pool on same OSDs - Performance Difference

2015-06-20 Thread Somnath Roy
this helps, Thanks & Regards Somnath -Original Message- From: Nick Fisk [mailto:n...@fisk.me.uk] Sent: Saturday, June 20, 2015 8:10 AM To: Somnath Roy Cc: ceph-users@lists.ceph.com Subject: RE: [ceph-users] Old vs New pool on same OSDs - Performance Difference Sorry to dig up this old thre

Re: [ceph-users] Old vs New pool on same OSDs - Performance Difference

2015-06-20 Thread Nick Fisk
20 15:39:05.679615", "event": "done" } ] ] The main delay seems to happen between reached_pg and started, any idea what would be happening in this period? Nick > -Original Message- > Fr

Re: [ceph-users] Old vs New pool on same OSDs - Performance Difference

2015-06-05 Thread Somnath Roy
Old vs New pool on same OSDs - Performance Difference > -Original Message- > From: ceph-users [mailto:ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com] On Behalf > Of Somnath Roy > Sent: 04 June 2015 22:41 > To: Nick Fisk; 'Gregory Farnum' > Cc: ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > Subject:

Re: [ceph-users] Old vs New pool on same OSDs - Performance Difference

2015-06-05 Thread Nick Fisk
> -Original Message- > From: ceph-users [mailto:ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com] On Behalf Of > Somnath Roy > Sent: 04 June 2015 22:41 > To: Nick Fisk; 'Gregory Farnum' > Cc: ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Old vs New pool on same

Re: [ceph-users] Old vs New pool on same OSDs - Performance Difference

2015-06-04 Thread Somnath Roy
, June 04, 2015 2:12 PM To: 'Gregory Farnum'; Somnath Roy Cc: ceph-users@lists.ceph.com Subject: RE: [ceph-users] Old vs New pool on same OSDs - Performance Difference > -Original Message- > From: ceph-users [mailto:ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com] On Behalf > Of Gregory

Re: [ceph-users] Old vs New pool on same OSDs - Performance Difference

2015-06-04 Thread Nick Fisk
> -Original Message- > From: ceph-users [mailto:ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com] On Behalf Of > Gregory Farnum > Sent: 04 June 2015 21:22 > To: Nick Fisk > Cc: ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Old vs New pool on same OSDs - Performance > Diffe

Re: [ceph-users] Old vs New pool on same OSDs - Performance Difference

2015-06-04 Thread Gregory Farnum
On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 6:31 AM, Nick Fisk wrote: > > Hi All, > > I have 2 pools both on the same set of OSD’s, 1st is the default rbd pool > created at installation 3 months ago, the other has just recently been > created, to verify performance problems. > > As mentioned both pools are on the sa

Re: [ceph-users] Old vs New pool on same OSDs - Performance Difference

2015-06-04 Thread Somnath Roy
Nick, Did you preinitialize the new rbd volume ? If not, do a seq write to fill up the entire volume first and then do a Random read. Thanks & Regards Somnath From: ceph-users [mailto:ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com] On Behalf Of Nick Fisk Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2015 6:32 AM To: ceph-users