On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 3:46 PM, Jens Rosenboom wrote:
> 2016-02-18 15:10 GMT+01:00 Dan van der Ster :
>> Hi,
>>
>> Thanks for linking to a current update on this problem [1] [2]. I
>> really hope that new Ceph installations aren't still following that
>> old advice... it's been known to be a prob
FWIW, We still had a couple of example cbt configuration files in the
github repo that used -n 64k until Jens pointed it out earlier this
week. That's now been fixed, so that should at least help.
Unfortunately there' still some old threads on the mailing list that
list it as a potential perfo
2016-02-18 15:10 GMT+01:00 Dan van der Ster :
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for linking to a current update on this problem [1] [2]. I
> really hope that new Ceph installations aren't still following that
> old advice... it's been known to be a problem for around a year and a
> half [3].
> That said, the "-n si
Hi,
Thanks for linking to a current update on this problem [1] [2]. I
really hope that new Ceph installations aren't still following that
old advice... it's been known to be a problem for around a year and a
half [3].
That said, the "-n size=64k" wisdom was really prevalent a few years
ago, and I
