Hello,
On Tue, 17 May 2016 12:12:02 +1000 Chris Dunlop wrote:
> Hi Christian,
>
> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 10:41:52AM +0900, Christian Balzer wrote:
> > On Tue, 17 May 2016 10:47:15 +1000 Chris Dunlop wrote:
> > Most your questions would be easily answered if you did spend a few
> > minutes with
Hi Christian,
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 10:41:52AM +0900, Christian Balzer wrote:
> On Tue, 17 May 2016 10:47:15 +1000 Chris Dunlop wrote:
> Most your questions would be easily answered if you did spend a few
> minutes with even the crappiest test cluster and observing things (with
> atop and the li
Hello,
On Tue, 17 May 2016 10:47:15 +1000 Chris Dunlop wrote:
> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 08:21:48AM +0900, Christian Balzer wrote:
> > On Mon, 16 May 2016 22:40:47 +0200 (CEST) Wido den Hollander wrote:
> > >
> > > pg_num is the actual amount of PGs. This you can increase without any
> > > actua
On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 10:40:47PM +0200, Wido den Hollander wrote:
> > Op 16 mei 2016 om 7:56 schreef Chris Dunlop :
> > Why do we have both pg_num and pgp_num? Given the docs say "The pgp_num
> > should be equal to the pg_num": under what circumstances might you want
> > these different, apart fr
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 08:21:48AM +0900, Christian Balzer wrote:
> On Mon, 16 May 2016 22:40:47 +0200 (CEST) Wido den Hollander wrote:
> >
> > pg_num is the actual amount of PGs. This you can increase without any
> > actual data moving.
>
> Yes and no.
>
> Increasing the pg_num will split PGs, w
Hello,
On Mon, 16 May 2016 22:40:47 +0200 (CEST) Wido den Hollander wrote:
>
> > Op 16 mei 2016 om 7:56 schreef Chris Dunlop :
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm trying to understand the potential impact on an active cluster of
> > increasing pg_num/pgp_num.
> >
> > The conventional wisdom, as gle
> Op 16 mei 2016 om 7:56 schreef Chris Dunlop :
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to understand the potential impact on an active cluster of
> increasing pg_num/pgp_num.
>
> The conventional wisdom, as gleaned from the mailing lists and general
> google fu, seems to be to increase pg_num followed by pg
