Re: [ceph-users] INFARNALIS with 64K Kernel PAGES

2016-03-01 Thread Somnath Roy
Sorry, I missed that you are upgrading from Hammer...I think it is probably a bug introduced in post hammer..Here is why it is happening IMO.. In hammer: - https://github.com/ceph/ceph/blob/hammer/src/os/FileJournal.cc#L158 In Master/Infernalis/Jewel: ---

Re: [ceph-users] INFARNALIS with 64K Kernel PAGES

2016-03-01 Thread Garg, Pankaj
The OSDS were created with 64K page size, and mkfs was done with the same size. After upgrade, I have not changed anything on the machine (except applied the ownership fix for files for user ceph:ceph) From: Somnath Roy [mailto:somnath@sandisk.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2016 9:32 PM To: Ga

Re: [ceph-users] INFARNALIS with 64K Kernel PAGES

2016-03-01 Thread Somnath Roy
Did you recreated OSDs on this setup meaning did you do mkfs with 64K page size ? From: ceph-users [mailto:ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com] On Behalf Of Garg, Pankaj Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2016 9:07 PM To: ceph-users@lists.ceph.com Subject: [ceph-users] INFARNALIS with 64K Kernel PAGES Hi,