Re: [ceph-users] Firefly to Hammer Upgrade -- HEALTH_WARN; too many PGs per OSD (480 > max 300)

2015-09-01 Thread 10 minus
Hi Greg, Thanks for the update.. I think the documentation on Ceph should be reworded. --snip-- http://ceph.com/docs/master/rados/operations/placement-groups/#choosing-the-number-of-placement-groups * Less than 5 OSDs set pg_num to 128 * Between 5 and 10 OSDs set pg_num to 512 * Between 10 and

Re: [ceph-users] Firefly to Hammer Upgrade -- HEALTH_WARN; too many PGs per OSD (480 > max 300)

2015-08-31 Thread Gregory Farnum
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 8:30 AM, 10 minus wrote: > Hi , > > I 'm in the process of upgrading my ceph cluster from Firefly to Hammer. > > The ceph cluster has 12 OSD spread across 4 nodes. > > Mons have been upgraded to hammer, since I have created pools with value > 512 and 256 , so am bit confus

Re: [ceph-users] Firefly to Hammer

2015-05-14 Thread Daniel Schneller
You should be able to do just that. We recently upgraded from Firefly to Hammer like that. Follow the order described on the website. Monitors, OSDs, MDSs. Notice that the Debian packages do not restart running daemons, but they _do_ start up not running ones. So say for some reason before you