; To: Justinas LINGYS
> Cc: "ceph-users@lists.ceph.com"
> Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Ceph and multiple RDMA NICs
> Message-ID:
> <
> can-gepjtyuhyur0qnbrae7zby7tylrnt9h94-nonb4wssao...@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
ced NIC.
Justin
From: David Turner mailto:drakonst...@gmail.com>>
Sent: Thursday, March 1, 2018 9:57:50 PM
To: Justinas LINGYS
Cc: ceph-users@lists.ceph.com<mailto:ceph-users@lists.ceph.com>
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Ceph and multiple RDMA NICs
There
get best
> out the advanced NIC.
>
> Justin
>
>
> From: David Turner
> Sent: Thursday, March 1, 2018 9:57:50 PM
> To: Justinas LINGYS
> Cc: ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Ceph and multiple RDMA NICs
>
> There has been some chatter on t
ustin
From: David Turner
Sent: Thursday, March 1, 2018 9:57:50 PM
To: Justinas LINGYS
Cc: ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Ceph and multiple RDMA NICs
There has been some chatter on the ML questioning the need to separate out the
public and private subnet
There has been some chatter on the ML questioning the need to separate out
the public and private subnets for Ceph. The trend seems to be in
simplifying your configuration which for some is not specifying multiple
subnets here. I haven't heard of anyone complaining about network problems
with putt
