the caching, something like the hsgt SSD800
range would be ideal.
From: Andrei Mikhailovsky [mailto:and...@arhont.com]
Sent: 26 June 2015 12:35
To: Nick Fisk
Cc: Dominik Zalewski; ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Ceph and EnhanceIO cache
Hi Nick,
I've played
essage -
> From: "Nick Fisk"
> To: "Dominik Zalewski"
> Cc: ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> Sent: Friday, 26 June, 2015 11:12:25 AM
> Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Ceph and EnhanceIO cache
> I think flashcache bombs out, I must admit I have tested that yet, but as I
ers@lists.ceph.com
> *Subject:* Re: [ceph-users] Ceph and EnhanceIO cache
>
>
>
> Thanks for your reply.
>
>
>
> Do you know by any chance how flashcache handles SSD going offline?
>
>
>
> Here is an snip from enhanceio wiki page:
>
>
>
> Failure of a
Sent: 26 June 2015 10:54
To: Nick Fisk
Cc: ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Ceph and EnhanceIO cache
Thanks for your reply.
Do you know by any chance how flashcache handles SSD going offline?
Here is an snip from enhanceio wiki page:
Failure of an SSD device in read
Thanks for your reply.
Do you know by any chance how flashcache handles SSD going offline?
Here is an snip from enhanceio wiki page:
Failure of an SSD device in read-only and write-through modes is
handled gracefully by allowing I/O to continue to/from the
source volume. An app
> -Original Message-
> From: ceph-users [mailto:ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com] On Behalf Of
> Dominik Zalewski
> Sent: 26 June 2015 09:59
> To: ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> Subject: [ceph-users] Ceph and EnhanceIO cache
>
> Hi,
>
> I came across this blog post mentioning using EnhanceI
