Hi,
Le 19/12/2014 15:57, Loic Dachary a écrit :
> The stable release have real names, that is what makes them different from
> development releases (dumpling, emperor, firefly, giant, hammer).
And I add that, from what I understand, one time in two the release
is LTS (Long Time Support). Firefl
On 19/12/2014 16:10, Lindsay Mathieson wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Dec 2014 03:57:42 PM you wrote:
>> The stable release have real names, that is what makes them different from
>> development releases (dumpling, emperor, firefly, giant, hammer).
>
> Ah, so we had two named firefly releases (Firefly 0.86
On Fri, 19 Dec 2014 03:57:42 PM you wrote:
>The stable release have real names, that is what makes them different from
> development releases (dumpling, emperor, firefly, giant, hammer).
Ah, so we had two named firefly releases (Firefly 0.86 & Firefly 0.87) - they
were both production and we have
On 19/12/2014 15:35, Lindsay Mathieson wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Dec 2014 03:27:53 PM you wrote:
>> On 19/12/2014 15:12, Lindsay Mathieson wrote:
>>> Will this make its way into the debian repo eventually?
>>
>> This is a development release that is not meant to be published in
>> distributions such as
On Fri, 19 Dec 2014 03:27:53 PM you wrote:
> On 19/12/2014 15:12, Lindsay Mathieson wrote:
> > Will this make its way into the debian repo eventually?
>
> This is a development release that is not meant to be published in
> distributions such as Debian, CentOS etc.
Ah, thanks.
Its not clear from
Hi Lindsay,
On 19/12/2014 15:12, Lindsay Mathieson wrote:
> Will this make its way into the debian repo eventually?
This is a development release that is not meant to be published in
distributions such as Debian, CentOS etc.
Cheers
>
> http://ceph.com/debian-giant
>
>
>
> __
