On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 8:12 AM Sander Smeenk wrote:
>
> Quoting Paul Emmerich (paul.emmer...@croit.io):
>
> > Yeah, CephFS is much closer to POSIX semantics for a filesystem than
> > NFS. There's an experimental relaxed mode called LazyIO but I'm not
> > sure if it's applicable here.
>
> Out of c
Quoting Paul Emmerich (paul.emmer...@croit.io):
> Yeah, CephFS is much closer to POSIX semantics for a filesystem than
> NFS. There's an experimental relaxed mode called LazyIO but I'm not
> sure if it's applicable here.
Out of curiosity, how would CephFS being more POSIX compliant cause
this muc
Thursday, 12 September 2019, 17.16 +0200 from Paul Emmerich
:
>Yeah, CephFS is much closer to POSIX semantics for a filesystem than
>NFS. There's an experimental relaxed mode called LazyIO but I'm not
>sure if it's applicable here.
>
>You can debug this by dumping slow requests from the MDS se
Yeah, CephFS is much closer to POSIX semantics for a filesystem than
NFS. There's an experimental relaxed mode called LazyIO but I'm not
sure if it's applicable here.
You can debug this by dumping slow requests from the MDS servers via
the admin socket
Paul
--
Paul Emmerich
Looking for help w
