Re: [ceph-users] [list admin] - membership disabled due to bounces

2013-08-12 Thread Dan Mick
Do I understand you to mean, James, that you bounce spam messages back to the sender, even if the sender is a listserv? That seems like a really bad idea, punishing the innocent at best, and causing problems like this at worst. IMO the best spam strategy is to drop it as early as possible at

Re: [ceph-users] [list admin] - membership disabled due to bounces

2013-08-11 Thread Alex Bligh
James, I'd prefer the list admins either tuned the sensitivity of the bounce filter or rejected the spam on ingress. I see nearly no spam so it seems my spam filter is effective :-) Alex On 11 Aug 2013, at 11:26, James Harper wrote: > This list actually does get a bit of spam, unlike most lis

Re: [ceph-users] [list admin] - membership disabled due to bounces

2013-08-11 Thread James Harper
This list actually does get a bit of spam, unlike most lists I'm subscribed to. I'm surprised more reputation filters haven't blocked it. Rejecting spam is the only right way to do it (junk mail folders are dumb), but obviously the ceph-users list is taking the bounces as indicating a problem wi