Re: [ceph-users] v0.80.4 Firefly released

2014-07-18 Thread Dmitry Smirnov
Hi Sage, A little favour -- It will be helpful if you could CC release announcements to ceph-maintain...@lists.ceph.com please. It is much easier to notice there comparing to higher volume {devel,users} lists. Thank you very much. -- All the best, Dmitry Smirnov GPG key : 4096R/53968D1

Re: [ceph-users] v0.80.4 Firefly released

2014-07-16 Thread Cheng Wei-Chung
hi all: This issue will meet deep-scrub error 100% with RBD user? I mean it is possible just occur sometimes. I use firefly v0.80.1 with kernel 3.8.0-37 and did not see any deep-scrub error. Then I still need to upgrade to 0.80.4 or I didn't get this issue? Thanks!! 2014-07-17 1:19 GMT+08:00

Re: [ceph-users] v0.80.4 Firefly released

2014-07-16 Thread Gregory Farnum
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 1:50 AM, James Harper wrote: > Can you offer some comments on what the impact is likely to be to the data in > an affected cluster? Should all data now be treated with suspicion and > restored back to before the firefly upgrade? I am under the impression that it's not ac

Re: [ceph-users] v0.80.4 Firefly released

2014-07-16 Thread Sage Weil
On Wed, 16 Jul 2014, Travis Rhoden wrote: > Hi Andrija, > > I'm running a cluster with both CentOS and Ubuntu machines in it.  I just > did some upgrades to 0.80.4, and I can confirm that doing "yum update ceph" > on the CentOS machine did result in having all OSDs on that machine > restarted auto

Re: [ceph-users] v0.80.4 Firefly released

2014-07-16 Thread Travis Rhoden
Hi Andrija, I'm running a cluster with both CentOS and Ubuntu machines in it. I just did some upgrades to 0.80.4, and I can confirm that doing "yum update ceph" on the CentOS machine did result in having all OSDs on that machine restarted automatically. I actually did not know that would happen,

Re: [ceph-users] v0.80.4 Firefly released

2014-07-16 Thread James Harper
> Hi! > > I'm trying to install ceph on Debian wheezy (from deb > http://ceph.com/debian/ wheezy main) and getting following error: > > # apt-get update && apt-get dist-upgrade -y && apt-get install -y ceph > > ... > > The following packages have unmet dependencies: > ceph : Depends: ceph-comm

Re: [ceph-users] v0.80.4 Firefly released

2014-07-16 Thread Sylvain Munaut
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 10:50 AM, James Harper wrote: > Can you offer some comments on what the impact is likely to be to the data in > an affected cluster? Should all data now be treated with suspicion and > restored back to before the firefly upgrade? Yes, I'd definitely like to know that too

Re: [ceph-users] v0.80.4 Firefly released

2014-07-16 Thread Pavel V. Kaygorodov
Hi! I'm trying to install ceph on Debian wheezy (from deb http://ceph.com/debian/ wheezy main) and getting following error: # apt-get update && apt-get dist-upgrade -y && apt-get install -y ceph ... The following packages have unmet dependencies: ceph : Depends: ceph-common (>= 0.78-500) but

Re: [ceph-users] v0.80.4 Firefly released

2014-07-16 Thread James Harper
om] On Behalf Of > Sage Weil > Sent: Wednesday, 16 July 2014 9:46 AM > To: ceph-de...@vger.kernel.org; ceph-us...@ceph.com > Subject: [ceph-users] v0.80.4 Firefly released > > This Firefly point release fixes an potential data corruption problem > when ceph-osd daemons ru

Re: [ceph-users] v0.80.4 Firefly released

2014-07-16 Thread Andrija Panic
Hi Sage, can anyone validate, if there is still "bug" inside RPMs that does automatic CEPH service restart after updating packages ? We are instructed to first update/restart MONs, and after that OSD - but that is impossible if we have MON+OSDs on same host...since the ceph is automaticaly restar

[ceph-users] v0.80.4 Firefly released

2014-07-15 Thread Sage Weil
This Firefly point release fixes an potential data corruption problem when ceph-osd daemons run on top of XFS and service Firefly librbd clients. A recently added allocation hint that RBD utilizes triggers an XFS bug on some kernels (Linux 3.2, and likely others) that leads to data corruption and