Re: [ceph-users] ulimit max user processes (-u) and non-root ceph clients

2013-12-17 Thread Dan van der Ster
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 8:36 PM, Dan Van Der Ster wrote: > > On Dec 16, 2013 8:26 PM, Gregory Farnum wrote: >> >> On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 11:08 AM, Dan van der Ster >> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > Sorry to revive this old thread, but I wanted to update you on the current >> > pains we're going thro

Re: [ceph-users] ulimit max user processes (-u) and non-root ceph clients

2013-12-16 Thread Jeff Bailey
On 12/16/2013 2:36 PM, Dan Van Der Ster wrote: On Dec 16, 2013 8:26 PM, Gregory Farnum wrote: On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 11:08 AM, Dan van der Ster wrote: Hi, Sorry to revive this old thread, but I wanted to update you on the current pains we're going through related to clients' nproc (and now

Re: [ceph-users] ulimit max user processes (-u) and non-root ceph clients

2013-12-16 Thread Dan Van Der Ster
On Dec 16, 2013 8:26 PM, Gregory Farnum wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 11:08 AM, Dan van der Ster > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Sorry to revive this old thread, but I wanted to update you on the current > > pains we're going through related to clients' nproc (and now nofile) > > ulimits. When I s

Re: [ceph-users] ulimit max user processes (-u) and non-root ceph clients

2013-12-16 Thread Gregory Farnum
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 11:08 AM, Dan van der Ster wrote: > Hi, > > Sorry to revive this old thread, but I wanted to update you on the current > pains we're going through related to clients' nproc (and now nofile) > ulimits. When I started this thread we were using RBD for Glance images > only, bu

Re: [ceph-users] ulimit max user processes (-u) and non-root ceph clients

2013-12-16 Thread Dan van der Ster
Hi, Sorry to revive this old thread, but I wanted to update you on the current pains we're going through related to clients' nproc (and now nofile) ulimits. When I started this thread we were using RBD for Glance images only, but now we're trying to enable RBD-backed Cinder volumes and are not rea

Re: [ceph-users] ulimit max user processes (-u) and non-root ceph clients

2013-09-20 Thread Dan Van Der Ster
On Sep 19, 2013, at 6:10 PM, Gregory Farnum wrote: > On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 11:43 PM, Dan Van Der Ster > wrote: >> >> On Sep 18, 2013, at 11:50 PM, Gregory Farnum >> wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 6:33 AM, Dan Van Der Ster >>> wrote: Hi, We just finished debugging a probl

Re: [ceph-users] ulimit max user processes (-u) and non-root ceph clients

2013-09-19 Thread Gregory Farnum
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 11:43 PM, Dan Van Der Ster wrote: > > On Sep 18, 2013, at 11:50 PM, Gregory Farnum > wrote: > >> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 6:33 AM, Dan Van Der Ster >> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> We just finished debugging a problem with RBD-backed Glance image creation >>> failures, and thought

Re: [ceph-users] ulimit max user processes (-u) and non-root ceph clients

2013-09-18 Thread Dan Van Der Ster
On Sep 18, 2013, at 11:50 PM, Gregory Farnum wrote: > On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 6:33 AM, Dan Van Der Ster > wrote: >> Hi, >> We just finished debugging a problem with RBD-backed Glance image creation >> failures, and thought our workaround would be useful for others. Basically, >> we found tha

Re: [ceph-users] ulimit max user processes (-u) and non-root ceph clients

2013-09-18 Thread Gregory Farnum
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 6:33 AM, Dan Van Der Ster wrote: > Hi, > We just finished debugging a problem with RBD-backed Glance image creation > failures, and thought our workaround would be useful for others. Basically, > we found that during an image upload, librbd on the glance api server was >

[ceph-users] ulimit max user processes (-u) and non-root ceph clients

2013-09-18 Thread Dan Van Der Ster
Hi, We just finished debugging a problem with RBD-backed Glance image creation failures, and thought our workaround would be useful for others. Basically, we found that during an image upload, librbd on the glance api server was consuming many many processes, eventually hitting the 1024 nproc li