e
> for the additional replica, and that would improve the recovery and read
> performance.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Maxime
>
>
>
> From: ceph-users <mailto:ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com>> on behalf of Henrik Korkuc
> mailto:li
eplica, and that would improve the
> recovery and read performance.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Maxime
>
>
>
> *From: *ceph-users on behalf of
> Henrik Korkuc
> *Date: *Friday 3 March 2017 11:35
> *To: *"ceph-users@lists.ceph.com"
> *Subject: *Re: [ceph-us
improve the recovery and read
performance.
Cheers,
Maxime
From: ceph-users on behalf of Henrik Korkuc
Date: Friday 3 March 2017 11:35
To: "ceph-users@lists.ceph.com"
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] replica questions
On 17-03-03 12:30, Matteo Dacrema wrote:
Hi All,
I’ve a production clust
On 17-03-03 12:30, Matteo Dacrema wrote:
Hi All,
I’ve a production cluster made of 8 nodes, 166 OSDs and 4 Journal SSD
every 5 OSDs with replica 2 for a total RAW space of 150 TB.
I’ve few question about it:
* It’s critical to have replica 2? Why?
Replica size 3 is highly recommended. I do
Hi All,
I’ve a production cluster made of 8 nodes, 166 OSDs and 4 Journal SSD every 5
OSDs with replica 2 for a total RAW space of 150 TB.
I’ve few question about it:
It’s critical to have replica 2? Why?
Does replica 3 makes recovery faster?
Does replica 3 makes rebalancing and recovery less he
