On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 1:24 AM, Blair Bethwaite
wrote:
> Thanks Ilya,
>
> We can probably handle ~6.2MB for a 100TB volume. Is it reasonable to expect
> a librbd client such as QEMU to only hold one object-map per guest?
Yes, I think so.
Thanks,
Ilya
___
Thanks Ilya,
We can probably handle ~6.2MB for a 100TB volume. Is it reasonable to
expect a librbd client such as QEMU to only hold one object-map per guest?
Cheers,
On 12 February 2018 at 21:01, Ilya Dryomov wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 6:25 AM, Blair Bethwaite
> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
>
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 6:25 AM, Blair Bethwaite
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Wondering if anyone can clarify whether there are any significant overheads
> from rbd features like object-map, fast-diff, etc. I'm interested in both
> performance overheads from a latency and space perspective, e.g., can
> ob
Hi all,
Wondering if anyone can clarify whether there are any significant overheads
from rbd features like object-map, fast-diff, etc. I'm interested in both
performance overheads from a latency and space perspective, e.g., can
object-map be sanely deployed on a 100TB volume or does the client try
