aul
wrote:
>
> Anyone able to offer any advice on this?
>
> Cheers,
> Adrian
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: ceph-users [mailto:ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com] On Behalf Of
> > Adrian Saul
> > Sent: Friday, 14 July 2017 6:05 PM
> >
Anyone able to offer any advice on this?
Cheers,
Adrian
> -Original Message-
> From: ceph-users [mailto:ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com] On Behalf Of
> Adrian Saul
> Sent: Friday, 14 July 2017 6:05 PM
> To: 'ceph-users@lists.ceph.com'
> Subject: [ceph
Hi All,
I have been reviewing the sizing of our PGs with a view to some intermittent
performance issues. When we have scrubs running, even when only a few are, we
can sometimes get severe impacts on the performance of RBD images, enough to
start causing VMs to appear stalled or unresponsive.
(128*2+256*2+256*14+256*5)/15 =~ 375.
On Thursday, November 05, 2015 10:21:00 PM Deneau, Tom wrote:
> I have the following 4 pools:
>
> pool 1 'rep2host' replicated size 2 min_size 1 crush_ruleset 1 object_hash
> rjenkins pg_num 128 pgp_num 128 last_change 88 flags hashpspool
> stripe_width 0 poo
I have the following 4 pools:
pool 1 'rep2host' replicated size 2 min_size 1 crush_ruleset 1 object_hash
rjenkins pg_num 128 pgp_num 128 last_change 88 flags hashpspool stripe_width 0
pool 17 'rep2osd' replicated size 2 min_size 1 crush_ruleset 1 object_hash
rjenkins pg_num 256 pgp_num 256 last_
