Hi Greg
Opened this one
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16567
Let us see what they say.
Cheers
G.
On 07/01/2016 04:09 AM, Gregory Farnum wrote:
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 10:50 PM, Goncalo Borges
wrote:
Hi Shinobu
Sorry probably I don't understand your question properly.
Is what you're wor
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 10:50 PM, Goncalo Borges
wrote:
> Hi Shinobu
>
>> Sorry probably I don't understand your question properly.
>> Is what you're worry about that object mapped to specific pg could be
>> overwritten on different osds?
>
> Not really. I was worried by seeing object sizes chang
es this make sense?
> G.
>
>
>
>
> From: Shinobu Kinjo [shinobu...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 30 June 2016 15:10
> To: Goncalo Borges
> Cc: ceph-us...@ceph.com
> Subject: Re: [ceph-users] object size changing after a pg repair
>
>
changing on the fly.
Does this make sense?
G.
From: Shinobu Kinjo [shinobu...@gmail.com]
Sent: 30 June 2016 15:10
To: Goncalo Borges
Cc: ceph-us...@ceph.com
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] object size changing after a pg repair
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 1:48
;: "Started\/Primary\/Active",
> "enter_time": "2016-06-27 04:57:36.876639",
> "might_have_unfound": [],
> "recovery_progress": {
> "backfill_targets": [],
> "waiting
te": "INACTIVE",
"scrubber.start": "MIN",
"scrubber.end": "MIN",
"scrubber.subset_last_update": "0'0",
"scrubber.deep": false,
&q
What does `ceph pg 6.263 query` show you?
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 12:02 PM, Goncalo Borges <
goncalo.bor...@sydney.edu.au> wrote:
> Dear Cephers...
>
> Today our ceph cluster gave us a couple of scrub errors regarding
> inconsistent pgs. We just upgraded from 9.2.0 to 10.2.2 two days ago.
>
> #
Dear Cephers...
Today our ceph cluster gave us a couple of scrub errors regarding inconsistent
pgs. We just upgraded from 9.2.0 to 10.2.2 two days ago.
# ceph health detail
HEALTH_ERR 2 pgs inconsistent; 2 scrub errors; crush map has legacy tunables
(require bobtail, min is firefly)
pg 6.39c i
