Hi Ben,
thanks for the information as well. It looks like we first will do some latency
tests between our data centers (thanks for the netem hint), before deciding
which topology is best for us. For simple DR scenarios rbd mirroring sounds
like the better solution so far.
We are still fans of th
Hi Nick,
We have a Ceph cluster spread across 3 datacenters at 3 institutions
in Michigan (UM, MSU, WSU). It certainly is possible. As noted you
will have increased latency for write operations and overall reduced
throughput as latency increases. Latency between our sites is 3-5ms.
We did some
Hi Maxime,
thank you for the information given. We will have a look and check.
Cheers
Nick
On Friday, November 25, 2016 09:48:35 PM Maxime Guyot wrote:
> Hi Nick,
>
> See inline comments.
>
> Cheers,
> Maxime
>
> On 25/11/16 16:01, "ceph-users on behalf of nick"
> wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >
Hi Nick,
See inline comments.
Cheers,
Maxime
On 25/11/16 16:01, "ceph-users on behalf of nick"
wrote:
>Hi,
>we are currently planning a new ceph cluster which will be used for
>virtualization (providing RBD storage for KVM machines) and we have some
>general questions.
>
Hi,
we are currently planning a new ceph cluster which will be used for
virtualization (providing RBD storage for KVM machines) and we have some
general questions.
* Is it advisable to have one ceph cluster spread over multiple datacenters
(latency is low, as they are not so far from each other
