Re: [ceph-users] civetweb vs Apache for rgw

2016-06-01 Thread Tyler Bishop
Use Haproxy. sudomakeinstall.com/uncategorized/ceph-radosgw-nginx-tengine-apache-and-now-civetweb - Original Message - From: c...@jack.fr.eu.org To: ceph-users@lists.ceph.com Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2016 5:01:05 AM Subject: Re: [ceph-users] civetweb vs Apache for rgw I'm

Re: [ceph-users] civetweb vs Apache for rgw

2016-05-24 Thread ceph
I'm using mod_rewrite and mod_expires Dunno if it can be done via civetweb, however, my installation is older On 24/05/2016 10:49, Karol Mroz wrote: > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 08:51:13AM +0100, Luis Periquito wrote: >> It may be possible to do it with civetweb, but I use apache because of >> HTTPS

Re: [ceph-users] civetweb vs Apache for rgw

2016-05-24 Thread Karol Mroz
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 08:51:13AM +0100, Luis Periquito wrote: > It may be possible to do it with civetweb, but I use apache because of > HTTPS config. Civetweb should be able to handle ssl just fine: rgw_frontends = civetweb port=7480s ssl_certificate=/path/to/some_cert.pem -- Regards, Karol

Re: [ceph-users] civetweb vs Apache for rgw

2016-05-24 Thread fridifree
Right now I am using Apache, There is no any comparison(performance and features) among them over the internet. if someone can share about is experience it would be great 2016-05-24 10:51 GMT+03:00 Luis Periquito : > It may be possible to do it with civetweb, but I use apache because of > HTT

Re: [ceph-users] civetweb vs Apache for rgw

2016-05-24 Thread Luis Periquito
It may be possible to do it with civetweb, but I use apache because of HTTPS config. On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 5:49 AM, fridifree wrote: > What apache gives that civetweb not? > Thank you > > On May 23, 2016 11:49 AM, "Anand Bhat" wrote: >> >> For performance, civetweb is better as fastcgi module

Re: [ceph-users] civetweb vs Apache for rgw

2016-05-23 Thread fridifree
What apache gives that civetweb not? Thank you On May 23, 2016 11:49 AM, "Anand Bhat" wrote: > For performance, civetweb is better as fastcgi module associated with > apache is single threaded. But Apache does have fancy features which > civetweb lacks. If you are looking for just the performance

Re: [ceph-users] civetweb vs Apache for rgw

2016-05-23 Thread Anand Bhat
For performance, civetweb is better as fastcgi module associated with apache is single threaded. But Apache does have fancy features which civetweb lacks. If you are looking for just the performance, then go for civetweb. Regards, Anand On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 12:43 PM, fridifree wrote: > Hi ev

[ceph-users] civetweb vs Apache for rgw

2016-05-23 Thread fridifree
Hi everyone, What would give the best performance in most of the cases, civetweb or apache? Thank you ___ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com