Hello,
On Wed, 13 Aug 2014 14:55:29 +0100 James Eckersall wrote:
> Hi Christian,
>
> Most of our backups are rsync or robocopy (windows), so they are
> incremental file-based backups.
> There will be a high level of parallelism as the backups run mostly
> overnight with similar start times.
In
Hi Christian,
Most of our backups are rsync or robocopy (windows), so they are
incremental file-based backups.
There will be a high level of parallelism as the backups run mostly
overnight with similar start times.
So far I've seen high iowait on the samba head we are using, but low osd
resource u
On Wed, 13 Aug 2014 12:47:22 +0100 James Eckersall wrote:
> Hi Christian,
>
> We're actually using the following chassis:
> http://rnt.de/en/bf_xxlarge.html
>
Ah yes, one of the Blazeback heritage.
But rather more well designed and thought through than most of them.
Using the motherboard SATA3
Hi Christian,
We're actually using the following chassis:
http://rnt.de/en/bf_xxlarge.html
So yes there are SAS expanders. There are 4 expanders, one is used for the
SSD's and the other three are for the SATA drives.
The 4 SSD's for the OSD's are mounted at the back of the chassis, along
with th
Hello,
On Wed, 13 Aug 2014 09:15:34 +0100 James Eckersall wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm looking for some advice on my ceph cluster.
>
> The current setup is as follows:
>
> 3 mon servers
>
> 4 storage servers with the following spec:
>
> 1x Intel Xeon E5-2640 @2.50GHz 6 core (12 with hyperthreading)
Hi,
I'm looking for some advice on my ceph cluster.
The current setup is as follows:
3 mon servers
4 storage servers with the following spec:
1x Intel Xeon E5-2640 @2.50GHz 6 core (12 with hyperthreading).
64GB DDR3 RAM
2x SSDSC2BB080G4 for OS
LSI MegaRAID 9260-16i with the following drives: