Re: [ceph-users] bad crc/signature errors

2018-08-14 Thread Nikola Ciprich
> > Hi Ilya, > > > > hmm, OK, I'm not sure now whether this is the bug which I'm > > experiencing.. I've had read_partial_message / bad crc/signature > > problem occurance on the second cluster in short period even though > > we're on the same ceph version (12.2.5) for quite long time (almost sin

Re: [ceph-users] bad crc/signature errors

2018-08-14 Thread Ilya Dryomov
On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 5:57 PM Nikola Ciprich wrote: > > Hi Ilya, > > hmm, OK, I'm not sure now whether this is the bug which I'm > experiencing.. I've had read_partial_message / bad crc/signature > problem occurance on the second cluster in short period even though > we're on the same ceph ver

Re: [ceph-users] bad crc/signature errors

2018-08-13 Thread Nikola Ciprich
Hi Ilya, hmm, OK, I'm not sure now whether this is the bug which I'm experiencing.. I've had read_partial_message / bad crc/signature problem occurance on the second cluster in short period even though we're on the same ceph version (12.2.5) for quite long time (almost since its release), so it'

Re: [ceph-users] bad crc/signature errors

2018-08-13 Thread Ilya Dryomov
On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 2:49 PM Nikola Ciprich wrote: > > Hi Paul, > > thanks, I'll give it a try.. do you think this might head to > upstream soon? for some reason I can't review comments for > this patch on github.. Is some new version of this patch > on the way, or can I try to apply this one

Re: [ceph-users] bad crc/signature errors

2018-08-13 Thread Nikola Ciprich
Hi Paul, thanks, I'll give it a try.. do you think this might head to upstream soon? for some reason I can't review comments for this patch on github.. Is some new version of this patch on the way, or can I try to apply this one to latest luminous? thanks a lot! nik On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 06

Re: [ceph-users] bad crc/signature errors

2018-08-10 Thread Paul Emmerich
I've built a work-around here: https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/23273 Paul 2018-08-10 12:51 GMT+02:00 Nikola Ciprich : > Hi, > > did this ever come to some conclusion? I've recently started seeing > those messages on one luminous cluster and am not sure whethere > those are dangerous or not..

Re: [ceph-users] bad crc/signature errors

2017-10-05 Thread Ilya Dryomov
On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 6:05 PM, Olivier Bonvalet wrote: > Le jeudi 05 octobre 2017 à 17:03 +0200, Ilya Dryomov a écrit : >> When did you start seeing these errors? Can you correlate that to >> a ceph or kernel upgrade? If not, and if you don't see other issues, >> I'd write it off as faulty hard

Re: [ceph-users] bad crc/signature errors

2017-10-05 Thread Ilya Dryomov
On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 12:01 PM, Olivier Bonvalet wrote: > Le jeudi 05 octobre 2017 à 11:47 +0200, Ilya Dryomov a écrit : >> The stable pages bug manifests as multiple sporadic connection >> resets, >> because in that case CRCs computed by the kernel don't always match >> the >> data that gets sen

Re: [ceph-users] bad crc/signature errors

2017-10-05 Thread Josy
m Cc: ceph-users ; Josy Subject: Re: [ceph-users] bad crc/signature errors Perhaps this is related to a known issue on some 4.4 and later kernels [1] where the stable write flag was not preserved by the kernel? [1] http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/19275 The stable pages bug manifests as multiple spo

Re: [ceph-users] bad crc/signature errors

2017-10-05 Thread Ilya Dryomov
eph-users [mailto:ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com] On Behalf Of >> Jason Dillaman >> Sent: Thursday, 5 October 2017 5:45 AM >> To: Gregory Farnum >> Cc: ceph-users ; Josy >> >> Subject: Re: [ceph-users] bad crc/signature errors >> >> Perhaps this is related

Re: [ceph-users] bad crc/signature errors

2017-10-05 Thread Ilya Dryomov
On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 9:03 AM, Olivier Bonvalet wrote: > I also see that, but on 4.9.52 and 4.13.3 kernel. > > I also have some kernel panic, but don't know if it's related (RBD are > mapped on Xen hosts). Do you have that panic message? Do you use rbd devices for something other than Xen? If

Re: [ceph-users] bad crc/signature errors

2017-10-04 Thread Adrian Saul
Thursday, 5 October 2017 5:45 AM > To: Gregory Farnum > Cc: ceph-users ; Josy > > Subject: Re: [ceph-users] bad crc/signature errors > > Perhaps this is related to a known issue on some 4.4 and later kernels [1] > where the stable write flag was not preserved by the kernel? >

Re: [ceph-users] bad crc/signature errors

2017-10-04 Thread Jason Dillaman
Perhaps this is related to a known issue on some 4.4 and later kernels [1] where the stable write flag was not preserved by the kernel? [1] http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/19275 On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 2:36 PM, Gregory Farnum wrote: > That message indicates that the checksums of messages between y

Re: [ceph-users] bad crc/signature errors

2017-10-04 Thread Gregory Farnum
That message indicates that the checksums of messages between your kernel client and OSD are incorrect. It could be actual physical transmission errors, but if you don't see other issues then this isn't fatal; they can recover from it. On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 8:52 AM Josy wrote: > Hi, > > We have

[ceph-users] bad crc/signature errors

2017-10-04 Thread Josy
Hi, We have setup a cluster with 8 OSD servers (31 disks) Ceph health is Ok. -- [root@las1-1-44 ~]# ceph -s   cluster:     id: de296604-d85c-46ab-a3af-add3367f0e6d     health: HEALTH_OK   services:     mon: 3 daemons, quorum ceph-las-mon-a1,ceph-las-mon-a2,ceph-las-mon-a3     mg