Re: [ceph-users] Why RBD is not enough [was: Inconsistent view on mounted CephFS]

2013-09-14 Thread Simon Leinen
Maciej Gałkiewicz writes: > On 13 September 2013 17:12, Simon Leinen wrote: >> >> [We're not using is *instead* of rbd, we're using it *in addition to* >> rbd. For example, our OpenStack (users') cinder volumes are stored in >> rbd.] > So you probably have cinder volumes in rbd but you boot ins

Re: [ceph-users] Why RBD is not enough [was: Inconsistent view on mounted CephFS]

2013-09-13 Thread Maciej Gałkiewicz
On 13 September 2013 17:12, Simon Leinen wrote: > > [We're not using is *instead* of rbd, we're using it *in addition to* > rbd. For example, our OpenStack (users') cinder volumes are stored in > rbd.] So you probably have cinder volumes in rbd but you boot instances from images. This is why y

Re: [ceph-users] Why RBD is not enough [was: Inconsistent view on mounted CephFS]

2013-09-13 Thread Simon Leinen
>> Just out of curiosity. Why you are using cephfs instead of rbd? [We're not using is *instead* of rbd, we're using it *in addition to* rbd. For example, our OpenStack (users') cinder volumes are stored in rbd.] To expand on what my colleague Jens-Christian wrote: > Two reasons: > - we are