> Op 20 december 2016 om 11:50 schreef Kees Meijs :
>
>
> Hi Wido,
>
> Thanks again! Good to hear, it saves us a lot of upgrade trouble in advance.
>
> If I'm not mistaken, we haven't done anything with CRUSH tunables. Any
> pointers on how to make sure we really didn't?
>
If you didn't touc
Hi Wido,
Thanks again! Good to hear, it saves us a lot of upgrade trouble in advance.
If I'm not mistaken, we haven't done anything with CRUSH tunables. Any
pointers on how to make sure we really didn't?
Regards,
Kees
On 20-12-16 10:14, Wido den Hollander wrote:
> No, you don't. A Hammer/Jewel
> Op 20 december 2016 om 9:50 schreef Kees Meijs :
>
>
> Hi Wido,
>
> At the moment, we're running Ubuntu 14.04 LTS using the Ubuntu Cloud
> Archive. To be precise again, it's QEMU/KVM 2.3+dfsg-5ubuntu9.4~cloud2
> linked to Ceph 0.94.8-0ubuntu0.15.10.1~cloud0.
>
> So yes, it's all about runnin
Hi Wido,
At the moment, we're running Ubuntu 14.04 LTS using the Ubuntu Cloud
Archive. To be precise again, it's QEMU/KVM 2.3+dfsg-5ubuntu9.4~cloud2
linked to Ceph 0.94.8-0ubuntu0.15.10.1~cloud0.
So yes, it's all about running a newer QEMU/KVM on a not so new version
of Ubuntu.
Question is, are
> Op 13 december 2016 om 9:05 schreef Kees Meijs :
>
>
> Hi guys,
>
> In the past few months, I've read some posts about upgrading from
> Hammer. Maybe I've missed something, but I didn't really read something
> on QEMU/KVM behaviour in this context.
>
> At the moment, we're using:
>
> > $ qe
Hi guys,
In the past few months, I've read some posts about upgrading from
Hammer. Maybe I've missed something, but I didn't really read something
on QEMU/KVM behaviour in this context.
At the moment, we're using:
> $ qemu-system-x86_64 --version
> QEMU emulator version 2.3.0 (Debian 1:2.3+dfsg-
